These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11191399)

  • 1. Transition from novelty to familiarity preference depending on recognition performance by 4-yr.-olds.
    Uehara I
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):837-48. PubMed ID: 11191399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in recognition and preference among four- and five-year-olds on a tactile learning and visual test.
    Uehara I
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Dec; 89(3 Pt 1):1029-35. PubMed ID: 10665041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task.
    Richmond J; Colombo M; Hayne H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 17723062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.
    Bonanno GA; Stillings NA
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(3):403-15. PubMed ID: 3799851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Something old, something new: a developmental transition from familiarity to novelty preferences with hidden objects.
    Shinskey JL; Munakata Y
    Dev Sci; 2010 Mar; 13(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 20136935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts.
    Mumby DG; Gaskin S; Glenn MJ; Schramek TE; Lehmann H
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(2):49-57. PubMed ID: 11992015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infant memory for object motion across a period of three months: implications for a four-phase attention function.
    Bahrick LE; Pickens JN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Jun; 59(3):343-71. PubMed ID: 7622984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neonatal aspiration lesions of the hippocampal formation impair visual recognition memory when assessed by paired-comparison task but not by delayed nonmatching-to-sample task.
    Pascalis O; Bachevalier J
    Hippocampus; 1999; 9(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 10641753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of retrieval cues on visual preferences and memory in infancy: evidence for a four-phase attention function.
    Bahrick LE; Hernandez-Reif M; Pickens JN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 9344484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detailed analysis of the behavior of Lister and Wistar rats in anxiety, object recognition and object location tasks.
    Ennaceur A; Michalikova S; Bradford A; Ahmed S
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 159(2):247-66. PubMed ID: 15817188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An exploratory mindset reduces preference for prototypes and increases preference for novel exemplars.
    Hansen J; Topolinski S
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Jun; 25(4):709-16. PubMed ID: 21547771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ebb and flow of infant attentional preferences: evidence for long-term recognition memory in 3-month-olds.
    Courage ML; Howe ML
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 Jul; 70(1):26-53. PubMed ID: 9679078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of attention on infants' preference for briefly exposed visual stimuli in the paired-comparison recognition-memory paradigm.
    Richards JE
    Dev Psychol; 1997 Jan; 33(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 9050387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition memory in tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) after repeated familiarization sessions.
    Khani A; Rainer G
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):364-71. PubMed ID: 22521708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?
    Holdstock JS; Mayes AR; Roberts N; Cezayirli E; Isaac CL; O'Reilly RC; Norman KA
    Hippocampus; 2002; 12(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 12099485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vibrissal paralysis unveils a preference for textural rather than positional novelty in the one-trial object recognition task in rats.
    Moreno C; Vivas O; Lamprea NP; Lamprea MR; Múnera A; Troncoso J
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 211(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 20347880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual novel stimuli in an ERP novelty oddball paradigm: effects of familiarity on repetition and recognition memory.
    Cycowicz YM; Friedman D
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):11-29. PubMed ID: 17241137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An animal model of sensation seeking: the adolescent rat.
    Stansfield KH; Philpot RM; Kirstein CL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Jun; 1021():453-8. PubMed ID: 15251928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrated memory for objects, places, and temporal order: evidence for episodic-like memory in mice.
    Dere E; Huston JP; De Souza Silva MA
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2005 Nov; 84(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 16102980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Color preference and familiarity in performance on brand logo recall.
    Huang KC; Lin CC; Chiang SY
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):587-96. PubMed ID: 19093619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.