286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11192137)
1. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and comfort of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Butrus S; Greiner JV; Discepola M; Finegold I
Clin Ther; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1462-72. PubMed ID: 11192137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Berdy GJ; Stoppel JO; Epstein AB
Clin Ther; 2002 Jun; 24(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 12117082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A placebo-controlled comparison of ketotifen fumarate and nedocromil sodium ophthalmic solutions for the prevention of ocular itching with the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Greiner JV; Minno G
Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1988-2005. PubMed ID: 12946546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the relative efficacy and clinical performance of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival antigen challenge model.
Berdy GJ; Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy SS; Brusatti RC
Clin Ther; 2000 Jul; 22(7):826-33. PubMed ID: 10945509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and comfort of olopatadine 0.2% versus epinastine 0.05% ophthalmic solution for treating itching and redness induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Mah FS; Rosenwasser LJ; Townsend WD; Greiner JV; Bensch G
Curr Med Res Opin; 2007 Jun; 23(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 17559743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Greiner JV; Udell IJ
Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of comfort using olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers compared to placebo using the conjunctival allergen-challenge model.
Brodsky M; Berger WE; Butrus S; Epstein AB; Irkec M
Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Apr; 29(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12695716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Abelson MB; Greiner JV
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Dec; 20(12):1953-8. PubMed ID: 15701212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study of the mast cell-stabilizing effects of treatment with olopatadine in the conjunctival allergen challenge model in humans.
Leonardi A; Abelson MB
Clin Ther; 2003 Oct; 25(10):2539-52. PubMed ID: 14667955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of onset and duration of action of patanol (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.1%) compared to Claritin (loratadine 10 mg) tablets in acute allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Abelson MB; Welch DL
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 2000; (230):60-3. PubMed ID: 11057354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity.
Abelson MB; Spitalny L
Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 9645717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Turner D
Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of olopatadine, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activity, using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Abelson MB
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1998 Sep; 81(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 9759796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-visit, randomized, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge study of scanning and imaging technology for objective quantification of eyelid swelling in the allergic reaction with contralateral use of olopatadine and artificial tears.
Abelson MB; Pratt S; Mussoline JE; Townsend D
Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):2070-84. PubMed ID: 12946551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.2% in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Pasquine T; Edwards MR; Gross RD; Robertson SM
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17883910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
