These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11192632)

  • 1. Temporal encoding in auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields: stochastic resonance.
    Stufflebeam SM; Poeppel D; Roberts TP
    Neuroreport; 2000 Dec; 11(18):4081-5. PubMed ID: 11192632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes.
    Roberts TP; Ferrari P; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1998 Oct; 9(14):3265-9. PubMed ID: 9831462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory detection of motion velocity in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Xiang J; Daniel SJ; Ishii R; Holowka S; Harrison RV; Chuang S
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 17(3):139-49. PubMed ID: 15974473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications.
    Chait M; Simon JZ; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 2004 Nov; 15(16):2455-8. PubMed ID: 15538173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal resolution properties of human auditory cortex: reflections in the neuromagnetic auditory evoked M100 component.
    Gage N; Roberts TP; Hickok G
    Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 1069(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 16403467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deconvolution of magnetic acoustic change complex (mACC).
    Bardy F; McMahon CM; Yau SH; Johnson BW
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Nov; 125(11):2220-2231. PubMed ID: 24704142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency.
    Roberts TP; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 1996 Apr; 7(6):1138-40. PubMed ID: 8817518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parametric merging of MEG and fMRI reveals spatiotemporal differences in cortical processing of spoken words and environmental sounds in background noise.
    Renvall H; Formisano E; Parviainen T; Bonte M; Vihla M; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jan; 22(1):132-43. PubMed ID: 21613467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-stage processing of sounds explains behavioral performance variations due to changes in stimulus contrast and selective attention: an MEG study.
    Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hänninen JL; Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Lampinen J; Sams M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46872. PubMed ID: 23071654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to iterated rippled noise.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):256-61. PubMed ID: 15953534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The M100 component of evoked magnetic fields differs by scaling factors: implications for signal averaging.
    Zacharias N; Sielużycki C; Kordecki W; König R; Heil P
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Aug; 48(8):1069-82. PubMed ID: 21342204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex.
    Poeppel D; Phillips C; Yellin E; Rowley HA; Roberts TP; Marantz A
    Neurosci Lett; 1997 Jan; 221(2-3):145-8. PubMed ID: 9121685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electromagnetic recording of the auditory system.
    Poeppel D; Hickok G
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2015; 129():245-55. PubMed ID: 25726273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stochastic resonance in brain activity elicited by auditory stimuli.
    Tanaka K; Nemoto I; Kawakatsu M; Uchikawa Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6300-3. PubMed ID: 19963920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound envelope encoding in the auditory cortex revealed by neuromagnetic responses in the theta to gamma frequency bands.
    Miyazaki T; Thompson J; Fujioka T; Ross B
    Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1506():64-75. PubMed ID: 23399682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity to temporal modulation rate and spectral bandwidth in the human auditory system: MEG evidence.
    Wang Y; Ding N; Ahmar N; Xiang J; Poeppel D; Simon JZ
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(8):2033-41. PubMed ID: 21975451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.
    Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C
    Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential effects of temporal regularity on auditory-evoked response amplitude: a decrease in silence and increase in noise.
    Okamoto H; Teismann H; Keceli S; Pantev C; Kakigi R
    Behav Brain Funct; 2013 Dec; 9():44. PubMed ID: 24299193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal analysis of auditory evoked cortical fields in fetal magnetoencephalography.
    Schneider U; Schleussner E; Haueisen J; Nowak H; Seewald HJ
    Brain Topogr; 2001; 14(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11599534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduction of brain noise influence in evoked neuromagnetic source localization using noise spatial correlation.
    Sekihara K; Takeuchi F; Kuriki S; Koizumi H
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Jun; 39(6):937-46. PubMed ID: 15551571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.