These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11192902)

  • 41. [Critical appraise of systematic reviews in vascular surgery. A practical example].
    Vaz Carneiro A
    Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc; 2008; 15(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 19116683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Challenges and strategies in developing nursing research capacity: a review of the literature.
    Segrott J; McIvor M; Green B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2006 Jul; 43(5):637-51. PubMed ID: 16157338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evidence-based medicine, part 4. An introduction to critical appraisal of articles on harm.
    Cardarelli R; Seater MM
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2007 Aug; 107(8):310-4. PubMed ID: 17785688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Demystifying the clinical nursing research process: the literature review.
    Colling J
    Urol Nurs; 2003 Aug; 23(4):297-9. PubMed ID: 14552077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. "There is nothing like looking, if you want to find something" - asking questions and searching for answers - the evidence based approach.
    Haroon M; Phillips R
    Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed; 2010 Apr; 95(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 20351149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Finding and evaluating renal evidence: bridging the knowledge gap.
    Bejaimal SA; Haynes RB; Shariff S; Garg AX
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2012 Jan; 19(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 22364795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Searching the literature. A beginners' guide.
    Wilson I
    Aust Fam Physician; 1998 May; 27(5):385-6. PubMed ID: 9613003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evidence-based practice for the busy nurse practitioner: part two: searching for the best evidence to clinical inquiries.
    Facchiano L; Snyder CH
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Nov; 24(11):640-8. PubMed ID: 23088695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Guidelines for reading literature reviews.
    Oxman AD; Guyatt GH
    CMAJ; 1988 Apr; 138(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 3355948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach.
    Cronin P; Ryan F; Coughlan M
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Jan 10-23; 17(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18399395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Critical appraisal. How to decide if review articles are trustworthy and relevant for practice.
    Cullum N
    NT Learn Curve; 1999 Aug; 3(6):4-6. PubMed ID: 10795232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How to perform a critically appraised topic: part 2, appraise, evaluate, generate, and recommend.
    Kelly AM; Cronin P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1048-55. PubMed ID: 22021495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed.
    Crowe M; Sheppard L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 21130354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Research methodology and applied statistics. Part 2: the literature search.
    Prince B; Makrides L; Richman J
    Physiother Can; 1980; 32(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10298052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The reading, writing, and arithmetic of the medical literature, part 2: critical evaluation of statistical reporting.
    Mansfield L
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2005 Oct; 95(4):315-21; quiz 322, 380. PubMed ID: 16279560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature.
    Rumrill PD; Fitzgerald SM; Merchant WR
    Work; 2010; 35(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 20364059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Reflections on information management in clinical research].
    Ferrer Salvans P
    Rev Clin Esp; 1990 Jun; 187(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 2270328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Systematic search offers a sound evidence base.
    Holmes S
    Nurs Times; 1996 Jan 24-30; 92(4):37-9. PubMed ID: 8710655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How can physicians keep up-to-date?
    Laine C; Weinberg DS
    Annu Rev Med; 1999; 50():99-110. PubMed ID: 10073266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.