These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11193067)
1. The case of Jane Anderson, Portobello, 1889-1914. Simpson MA; Squires TJ; Busuttil A J R Soc Med; 2000 Dec; 93(12):646-8. PubMed ID: 11193067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Considerations on 113 cases of application of mid-forceps.1956]. Martínez Pacheco J Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2011 Aug; 79(8):516-24. PubMed ID: 21966851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of some early obstetrical instruments. Burns DN; Calache LD Caduceus; 1987; 3(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 3304562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. William Smellie's obstetrical forceps. Campbell M Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun; 44(3):184-5. PubMed ID: 15191439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Representation of Caesarean section and forceps delivery in the fine arts of the 20th and 21st centuries]. Szabó A Orv Hetil; 2012 Dec; 153(50):1998-2001. PubMed ID: 23220366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstetrics and the family physician: a medical historian's perspective. Borst CG J Am Board Fam Pract; 1994; 7(6):530-4. PubMed ID: 7847119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ["An appropriate forceps"--150-year anniversary of Simpson's forceps]. Børdahl PE; Hem E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Dec; 118(30):4662-5. PubMed ID: 9914748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Blame and vindication in the early modern birthing chamber. McTavish L Med Hist; 2006 Oct; 50(4):447-64. PubMed ID: 17066128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Operative vaginal delivery - An historical perspective. Baskett TF Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Apr; 56():3-10. PubMed ID: 30253921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robert Barnes and his obstetric forceps. Forster FM Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1971 Aug; 11(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 4940469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Smith v. Clark and Clark v. Smith: eighteenth-century Scottish doctors in dispute. Leneman L Med Hist; 2002 Jan; 46(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 11877985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The forceps. History. Current indications]. Dumont M Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Apr; 83(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 3293169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Changes in Norwegian obstetric practices, 1915-1961]. Børdahl PE; Hem E Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Dec; 124(24):3231-4. PubMed ID: 15608776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [With forceps all over the world--Christian Kielland and his forceps]. Hem E; Børdahl PE Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2001 May; 121(12):1496-7. PubMed ID: 11449774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obstetric rectovaginal fistula: should there be a different treatment paradigm? Keighley MRB Colorectal Dis; 2017 Sep; 19(9):863. PubMed ID: 28667687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]