100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11194082)
1. Validation of a decision support system for the cytodiagnosis of fine needle aspirates of the breast using a prospectively collected dataset from multiple observers in a working clinical environment.
Cross SS; Stephenson TJ; Mohammed T; Harrisont RF
Cytopathology; 2000 Dec; 11(6):503-12. PubMed ID: 11194082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a statistically derived decision tree for the cytodiagnosis of fine needle aspirates of the breast (FNAB).
Cross SS; Dubé AK; Johnson JS; McCulloch TA; Quincey C; Harrison RF; Ma Z
Cytopathology; 1998 Jun; 9(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 9638379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Observer study of a prototype clinical decision support system for breast cancer diagnosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Boroczky L; Simpson M; Abe H; Drysdale J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 23345346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural network modeling for surgical decisions on traumatic brain injury patients.
Li YC; Liu L; Chiu WT; Jian WS
Int J Med Inform; 2000 Jan; 57(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10708251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image analysis of low magnification images of fine needle aspirates of the breast produces useful discrimination between benign and malignant cases.
Cross SS; Bury JP; Stephenson TJ; Harrison RF
Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):265-73. PubMed ID: 9252744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: an analysis of 258 consecutive aspirates.
Sarfati MR; Fox KA; Warneke JA; Fajardo LL; Hunter GC; Rappaport WD
Am J Surg; 1994 Dec; 168(6):529-31; discussion 531-2. PubMed ID: 7977990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical decision support system for prediction of pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Paydar K; Niakan Kalhori SR; Akbarian M; Sheikhtaheri A
Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():239-246. PubMed ID: 27919382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: challenges and promises.
Masood S
Cancer; 1998 Aug; 84(4):197-9. PubMed ID: 9723592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers.
Regner DM; Hesley GK; Hangiandreou NJ; Morton MJ; Nordland MR; Meixner DD; Hall TJ; Farrell MA; Mandrekar JN; Harmsen WS; Charboneau JW
Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):425-37. PubMed ID: 16436810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Use of multilayer perception artificial neutral networks for the prediction of the probability of malignancy in adnexal tumors].
Smoleń A; Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):855-62. PubMed ID: 14674136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast Cancer Detection with Reduced Feature Set.
Mert A; Kılıç N; Bilgili E; Akan A
Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():265138. PubMed ID: 26078774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing Breast Cancer Risk with an Artificial Neural Network.
Sepandi M; Taghdir M; Rezaianzadeh A; Rahimikazerooni S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(4):1017-1019. PubMed ID: 29693975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a clinical decision rule for triage of women with palpable breast masses.
Reeves MJ; Osuch JR; Pathak DR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 56(7):636-45. PubMed ID: 12921932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer.
Lundin M; Lundin J; Burke HB; Toikkanen S; Pylkkänen L; Joensuu H
Oncology; 1999 Nov; 57(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10575312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.
Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Beigzadeh A
Technol Health Care; 2016; 24(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 26409558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 8539365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunocytochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptors on 219 fine-needle aspirates of breast cancer. A prospective study.
Marrazzo A; Taormina P; Leonardi P; Lupo F; Filosto S
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 7763033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of fine needle aspiration and Tru-Cut biopsy of palpable mammary lesions.
Scopa CD; Koukouras D; Spiliotis J; Harkoftakis J; Koureleas S; Kyriakopoulou D; Tzoracoleftherakis E
Cancer Detect Prev; 1996; 20(6):620-4. PubMed ID: 8939348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast: factors affecting sensitivity.
Brown LA; Coghill SB
Cytopathology; 1991; 2(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 1912363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
