BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11194084)

  • 1. Optimising FNA processing--a collection fluid allowing Giemsa, PAP and H & E staining, and facilitating thinprep, cytospin and direct smears and ancillary tests.
    Stock D; Misir V; Johnson S
    Cytopathology; 2000 Dec; 11(6):523-4. PubMed ID: 11194084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations in pancreatic fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
    de Luna R; Eloubeidi MA; Sheffield MV; Eltoum I; Jhala N; Jhala D; Chen VK; Chhieng DC
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Feb; 30(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 14755754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Definitions in tissue acquisition: core biopsy, cell block, and beyond.
    Jhala N; Jhala D
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Jan; 24(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 24215758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved preoperative definitive diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma in FNAs prepared with both ThinPrep and conventional smears compared with FNAs prepared with ThinPrep alone.
    Luu MH; Fischer AH; Pisharodi L; Owens CL
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Feb; 119(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 21140483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [An improved method of preparative techniques for electron microscopic examination in renal biopsy].
    Wu XY; Zhu XJ; Zen S
    Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2000 Feb; 25(1):90. PubMed ID: 12212265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective study comparing rapid assessment of smears and ThinPrep for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates.
    LeBlanc JK; Emerson RE; Dewitt J; Symms M; Cramer HM; McHenry L; Wade CL; Wang X; Musto P; Eichelberger L; Al-Haddad M; Johnson C; Sherman S
    Endoscopy; 2010 May; 42(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 20101566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast fine-needle aspiration. A comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears.
    Bédard YC; Pollett AF
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Apr; 111(4):523-7. PubMed ID: 10191773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How can an endosonographer assess for diagnostic sufficiency and options for handling the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimen and ancillary studies.
    Hébert-Magee S
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Jan; 24(1):29-56. PubMed ID: 24215759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bile duct brushings cytology--improving sensitivity of diagnosis using the ThinPrep technique: a review of 113 cases.
    Sheehan MM; Fraser A; Ravindran R; McAteer D
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):225-33. PubMed ID: 17488259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Preparation and staining of Domodex folliculorum specimen].
    Li YX; Zhang H; Liu ZZ
    Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2002; 20(4):196. PubMed ID: 12568015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitfalls in EUS FNA.
    Fujii LL; Levy MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2014 Jan; 24(1):125-42. PubMed ID: 24215764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of ThinPrep preparation of cervical smears: a 1,000-case, investigator-sponsored study.
    Awen C; Hathway S; Eddy W; Voskuil R; Janes C
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1994; 11(1):33-6; discussion 36-7. PubMed ID: 7956657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ThinPrep vs. conventional smears in fine-needle aspirations of sarcomas: A morphological and immunocytochemical study.
    Guiter GE; Gatscha RM; Zakowski MF
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Nov; 21(5):351-4. PubMed ID: 10527484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ThinPrep processing of endoscopic brushing specimens.
    Wang HH; Sovie S; Trawinski G; Garcia LW; Abu-Jawdeh GM; Upton M; Werneke S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Feb; 105(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 8607439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic value of liquid-based (Thinprep) preparations in nongynecologic cases.
    Nasuti JF; Tam D; Gupta PK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Feb; 24(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 11169896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cellular fixation. A study of CytoRich Red and Cytospin Collection Fluid.
    Weidmann J; Chaubal A; Bibbo M
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 9022742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The value of thin-layer cytology in intraoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic cancer].
    Zhang ZH; Zhao DB; Zhao LL; Pan QJ; Shan Y; Wang CF; Zhao P
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 30(6):476-9. PubMed ID: 19024528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ancillary techniques on direct-smear aspirate slides: a significant evolution for cytopathology techniques.
    Knoepp SM; Roh MH
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Mar; 121(3):120-8. PubMed ID: 22786714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of ThinPrep versus conventional smear cytopreparatory techniques for fine-needle aspiration specimens of head and neck masses.
    Ford L; Rasgon BM; Hilsinger RL; Cruz RM; Axelsson K; Rumore GJ; Schmidtknecht TM; Puligandla B; Sawicki J; Pshea W
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2002 May; 126(5):554-61. PubMed ID: 12075231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fine needle aspiration of renal cortical lesions in adults.
    Adeniran AJ; Al-Ahmadie H; Iyengar P; Reuter VE; Lin O
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Oct; 38(10):710-5. PubMed ID: 19950394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.