These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11194206)

  • 1. The consequence of ignoring a nested factor on measures of effect size in analysis of variance.
    Wampold BE; Serlin RC
    Psychol Methods; 2000 Dec; 5(4):425-33. PubMed ID: 11194206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power and measures of effect size in analysis of variance with fixed versus random nested factors.
    Siemer M; Joormann J
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):497-517. PubMed ID: 14664685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should providers of treatment be regarded as a random factor? If it ain't broke, don't "fix" it: a comment on Siemer and Joormann (2003).
    Serlin RC; Wampold BE; Levin JR
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):524-34. PubMed ID: 14664687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size.
    Grissom RJ; Kim JJ
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Jun; 6(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 11411438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of method in treatment effectiveness research: evidence from meta-analysis.
    Wilson DB; Lipsey MW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):413-29. PubMed ID: 11778681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Therapists as fixed versus random effects-some statistical and conceptual issues: a comment on Siemer and Joormann (2003).
    Crits-Christoph P; Tu X; Gallop R
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 14664686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assumptions and consequences of treating providers in therapy studies as fixed versus random effects: reply to Crits-Christoph, Tu, and Gallop (2003) and Serlin, Wampold, and Levin (2003).
    Siemer M; Joormann J
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):535-44. PubMed ID: 14664688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Some fallacies of statistical inferences about psychotherapy.
    Morstyn R
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 1993 Mar; 27(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 8481149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implications of therapist effects for the design and analysis of comparative studies of psychotherapies.
    Crits-Christoph P; Mintz J
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1991 Feb; 59(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 2002139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hierarchical continuous-time sequential analysis: a strategy for clinical research.
    Gardner W
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1993 Dec; 61(6):975-83. PubMed ID: 8113498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring psychotherapy outcomes with the Behavioral Health Measure-20: Efficient and comprehensive.
    Kopta M; Owen J; Budge S
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2015 Dec; 52(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 26641374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of outcome measures in assessing client change and treatment decisions.
    Hatfield DR; Ogles BM
    J Clin Psychol; 2006 Mar; 62(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 16385479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some methodological and statistical issues in the study of change processes in psychotherapy.
    Laurenceau JP; Hayes AM; Feldman GC
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 27(6):682-95. PubMed ID: 17328996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical analysis of ordinal categorical status after therapies.
    Grissom RJ
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1994 Apr; 62(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 8201065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond measures and monitoring: Realizing the potential of feedback-informed treatment.
    Miller SD; Hubble MA; Chow D; Seidel J
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2015 Dec; 52(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 26641375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The analysis of change: issues, fallacies, and new ideas.
    Gottman JM; Rushe RH
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1993 Dec; 61(6):907-10. PubMed ID: 8113491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the next generation of process research.
    Pachankis JE; Goldfried MR
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 27(6):760-8. PubMed ID: 17316940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinically significant change in psychotherapy for depressive disorders.
    Moleiro C; Beutler LE
    J Affect Disord; 2009 May; 115(1-2):220-4. PubMed ID: 18851885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heterogeneity of variance in clinical data.
    Grissom RJ
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2000 Feb; 68(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 10710850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The phase model of psychotherapy outcome: Domain-specific trajectories of change in outpatient treatment.
    Sembill A; Vocks S; Kosfelder J; Schöttke H
    Psychother Res; 2019 May; 29(4):541-552. PubMed ID: 29166844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.