These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11194362)

  • 1. Radiovisiography in the detection of periapical lesions.
    Sullivan JE; Di Fiore PM; Koerber A
    J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 11194362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging.
    Tirrell BC; Miles DA; Brown CE; Legan JJ
    J Endod; 1996 Feb; 22(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 8935022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
    Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions.
    Wallace JA; Nair MK; Colaco MF; Kapa SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jul; 92(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 11458252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography.
    Barbat J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1998 Dec; 24(12):837-42. PubMed ID: 10023266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film.
    Ozen T; Kamburoğlu K; Cebeci AR; Yüksel SP; Paksoy CS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 18996725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws.
    Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17048029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography.
    Sogur E; Baksi BG; Gröndahl HG; Lomcali G; Sen BH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):458-64. PubMed ID: 19767516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography, and ultrasound in diagnosing periapical lesions.
    Raghav N; Reddy SS; Giridhar AG; Murthy S; Yashodha Devi BK; Santana N; Rakesh N; Kaushik A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 20727498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images.
    Mistak EJ; Loushine RJ; Primack PD; West LA; Runyan DA
    J Endod; 1998 Apr; 24(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 9641132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detailed tomography of periapical and periodontal lesions. Diagnostic accuracy compared with periapical radiography.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Vähätalo K; Neva M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 9446979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two different direct digital radiography systems for the ability to detect artificially prepared periapical lesions.
    Folk RB; Thorpe JR; McClanahan SB; Johnson JD; Strother JM
    J Endod; 2005 Apr; 31(4):304-6. PubMed ID: 15793390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of computer-aided image interpretation to the diagnosis of periapical bone lesions.
    Mol A; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Nov; 21(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 1299632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of detailed zonography with periapical radiography for the detection of periapical lesions.
    Tammisalo T; Luostarinen T; Rosberg J; Vähätalo K; Tammisalo EH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 May; 24(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 9515382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing.
    Kullendorff B; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Nov; 82(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 8936525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions.
    Paurazas SB; Geist JR; Pink FE; Hoen MM; Steiman HR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Mar; 89(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 10710463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions.
    Koenig L; Parks E; Analoui M; Eckert G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15140821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions.
    Gundappa M; Ng SY; Whaites EJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):326-33. PubMed ID: 16940480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.