242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11194369)
1. Effects of irrigation on debris and smear layer on canal walls prepared by two rotary techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Peters OA; Barbakow F
J Endod; 2000 Jan; 26(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11194369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study.
Metzger Z; Teperovich E; Cohen R; Zary R; Paqué F; Hülsmann M
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 20307746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SEM evaluation of root canal debridement with Sonicare CanalBrush irrigation.
Salman MI; Baumann MA; Hellmich M; Roggendorf MJ; Termaat S
Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 20518928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root canal wall cleanliness after calcium hydroxide removal using three irrigation regimens.
Naaman A; Kaloustian H; Ounsi HF; Naaman-Bou Abboud N; Ricci C; Medioni E
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 17211500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.
Kiran S; Prakash S; Siddharth PR; Saha S; Geojan NE; Ramachandran M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 27595725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cleanliness of the root canal walls after preparation with Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments: a SEM study].
Lichota D; Nowicka A; Woźniak K; Lipski M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(3):58-62. PubMed ID: 19839513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer.
Torabinejad M; Khademi AA; Babagoli J; Cho Y; Johnson WB; Bozhilov K; Kim J; Shabahang S
J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12669874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
