These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11195719)

  • 1. On the role of eye movements and saccade preparation in generating auditory inhibition of return.
    Mondor TA; Terrio NA; Hurlburt J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Dec; 54(4):326-38. PubMed ID: 11195719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The contribution of general and specific motor inhibitory sets to the so-called auditory inhibition of return.
    Tassinari G; Campara D; Benedetti C; Berlucchi G
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Oct; 146(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 12355281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention: evidence of location-based and frequency-based inhibition of return.
    Mondor TA; Breau LM; Milliken B
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 9529913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye-movements intervening between two successive sounds disrupt comparisons of auditory location.
    Pavani F; Husain M; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 189(4):435-49. PubMed ID: 18566808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral interactions in saccade programming. A saccade-latency study.
    Cavegn D
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 May; 109(2):312-32. PubMed ID: 8738379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets.
    Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictability of the cue-target relation and the time-course of auditory inhibition of return.
    Mondor TA
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1501-9. PubMed ID: 10598465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facilitative and inhibitory effects of cuing sound duration, intensity, and timbre.
    Mondor TA; Lacey TE
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):726-36. PubMed ID: 11436741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Looking at the ventriloquist: visual outcome of eye movements calibrates sound localization.
    Pages DS; Groh JM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72562. PubMed ID: 24009691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements.
    Crawford TJ; Muller HJ
    Vision Res; 1992 Feb; 32(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 1574846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of head position on the spatial representation of acoustic targets.
    Goossens HH; van Opstal AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Jun; 81(6):2720-36. PubMed ID: 10368392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships between manual reaction time and saccade latency in response to visual and auditory stimuli.
    Engelken EJ; Stevens KW; Enderle JD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Apr; 62(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 2031632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic sound localization during rapid eye-head gaze shifts.
    Vliegen J; Van Grootel TJ; Van Opstal AJ
    J Neurosci; 2004 Oct; 24(42):9291-302. PubMed ID: 15496665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory spatial attention is encoded in a retinotopic reference frame across eye-movements.
    Schut MJ; Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202414. PubMed ID: 30125311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition of return following an auditory cue. The role of central reorienting events.
    Spence C; Driver J
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Feb; 118(3):352-60. PubMed ID: 9497142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaction between location- and frequency-based inhibition of return in human auditory system.
    Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 176(4):630-40. PubMed ID: 16917767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of onsets and offsets on visual attention.
    Pratt J; McAuliffe J
    Psychol Res; 2001; 65(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11571913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory cues and inhibition of return: the importance of oculomotor activation.
    Reuter-Lorenz PA; Rosenquist JN
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Nov; 112(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 8951414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of visual stimuli is improved by accompanying auditory stimuli: the role of eye movements and sound location.
    Doyle MC; Snowden RJ
    Perception; 2001; 30(7):795-810. PubMed ID: 11515953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. I. Anti-cues for pro-saccades.
    Fischer B; Weber H
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 9655226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.