143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11198033)
1. Radical abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for stage IB cervical cancer: what's the point?
Patsner B
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(5):466-8. PubMed ID: 11198033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Obermair A; Gebski V; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Levenback C; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 18722970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy--a randomised phase II trial: perioperative outcomes and surgicopathological measurements.
Naik R; Jackson KS; Lopes A; Cross P; Henry JA
BJOG; 2010 May; 117(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 20236108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.
Gil-Moreno A; Puig O; Pérez-Benavente MA; Díaz B; Vergés R; De la Torre J; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15904613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years.
Covens A; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; DePetrillo AD; Lickrish G; Colgan T; Chapman W; Shaw P
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11330939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up.
Spirtos NM; Eisenkop SM; Schlaerth JB; Ballon SC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 187(2):340-8. PubMed ID: 12193922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomies in the surgical treatment of cervical cancer].
Lampé R; Póka R
Orv Hetil; 2017 Sep; 158(36):1403-1409. PubMed ID: 28868914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Ramirez PT; Slomovitz BM; Soliman PT; Coleman RL; Levenback C
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 16472844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].
Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Pikaart DP; Holloway RW; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; Ortiz BH; Denardis SA
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 17692367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer.
Renaud MC; Plante M; Roy M
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11006032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our instruments and technique.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Perone C; Iuzzolino D; Rasile M; Tinelli A
Surg Oncol; 2009 Dec; 18(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 18805001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
