142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11199438)
1. [Experimental studies on image quality in conventional film screen system, digital phosphor storage plate mammography in mangnification technique and digital mammography in CCD-technique].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Bautz W
Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):965-8. PubMed ID: 11199438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of digital luminescence mammography and conventional film - screen system: preliminary results of clinical evaluation.
Perlet C; Becker C; Sittek H; Pistitsch C; Jäger L; Kessler M; Reiser M
Eur J Med Res; 1998 Mar; 3(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 9502757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Full-field digital mammography].
Bick U
Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):957-64. PubMed ID: 11199437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Efficacy of storage phosphor-based digital mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer--comparison with film-screen mammography].
Kitahama H
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 May; 51(5):547-60. PubMed ID: 1651472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Storage phosphor and film-screen mammography: performance with different mammographic techniques.
Kheddache S; Thilander-Klang A; Lanhede B; Månsson LG; Bjurstam N; Ackerholm P; Björneld L
Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 10354868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Film-screen mammography versus digital storage plate mammography: hard copy and monitor display of microcalcifications and focal findings--a retrospective clinical and histologic analysis].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Aichinger U; Tartsch M; Kuchar I; Bödicker A; Evertsz C; Peitgen HO; Bautz W
Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1220-4. PubMed ID: 12964077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an analog screen-film technique using a low-contrast phantom.
Krug KB; Stützer H; Schröder R; Boecker J; Poggenborg J; Lackner K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Sep; 191(3):W80-8. PubMed ID: 18716083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Phantom study for the detection of simulated lesions in five different digital and one conventional mammography system].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Lell M; Böhner C; Wenkel E; Imhoff K; Schmid A; Krug B; Bautz W
Rofo; 2004 Aug; 176(8):1127-32. PubMed ID: 15346289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cassette-based digital mammography.
Seibert JA; Boone JM; Cooper VN; Lindfors KK
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Oct; 3(5):413-27. PubMed ID: 15453806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Digital magnification mammography in computed radiography. Initial clinical results].
Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Funke M; Wiese M; von Heyden D; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 9411475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
