These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11199515)

  • 1. Relative validity effects with either one or two more valid cues in Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning.
    Murphy RA; Baker AG; Fouquet N
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jan; 27(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 11199515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative validity of contextual and discrete cues.
    Murphy RA; Baker AG; Fouquet N
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Apr; 27(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 11296489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.
    Holland PC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Oct; 10(4):476-97. PubMed ID: 6491608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual learning in an appetitive Pavlovian procedure: analysis of the effectiveness of the common element.
    Mondragón E; Murphy RA
    Behav Processes; 2010 Mar; 83(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 20026195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ambiguity and context processing in human predictive learning.
    Callejas-Aguilera JE; Rosas JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):482-94. PubMed ID: 20718557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lesions of the hippocampus or fornix do not interfere with the relative validity effect on a discrete stimulus or the context.
    Murphy RA; McDonald RJ; Baker AG
    Behav Brain Res; 1998 Apr; 92(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9588685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. General and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer: the effect of shifts in motivational state and inactivation of the ventral tegmental area.
    Corbit LH; Janak PH; Balleine BW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 26(11):3141-9. PubMed ID: 18005062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control of instrumental performance by Pavlovian and instrumental stimuli.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Jan; 20(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 8308492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual learning in flavor aversion: evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness.
    Blair CA; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 12561132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: roles of sensory preconditioning and latent inhibition.
    Rodríguez G; Alonso G
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 17728074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The number of trials of compound conditioning: its effect on latent inhibition in rats.
    Schnur P
    Am J Psychol; 1975 Sep; 88(3):411-9. PubMed ID: 1200189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the relationship between anticipatory behaviour in a Pavlovian paradigm and Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer in rats (Rattus norvegicus).
    van den Bos R; van der Harst J; Vijftigschild N; Spruijt B; van Luijtelaar G; Maes R
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 153(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 15265635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the perceptual learning effect in flavour aversion learning: evidence for stimulus differentiation.
    Mondragón E; Hall G
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Apr; 55(2):153-69. PubMed ID: 12075981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An examination of the effectiveness of inflation and deflation treatments in detecting within-compound learning of a taste aversion.
    Pineño O
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17320310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the effects of discriminative and Pavlovian inhibitors and excitors on instrumental responding.
    Lombas AS; Kearns DN; Weiss SJ
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 18304758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of comparison between similar stimuli on the effectiveness of their unique features.
    Lombas AS; Alonso G; Rodríguez G
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18242877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of information about the response-outcome relation in instrumental discrimination learning.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jul; 16(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 2398337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of context-specificity of the CS-preexposure effect in Pavlovian excitatory and inhibitory conditioning.
    Nakajima S; Takahashi K; Blaisdell AP
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 16675159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity.
    Horsley RR; Cassaday HJ
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2008 May; 32(4):1057-63. PubMed ID: 18406505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Operant and Pavlovian control of visual stimulus orienting and food-related behaviors in rats with lesions of the amygdala central nucleus.
    Holland PC; Han JS; Winfield HM
    Behav Neurosci; 2002 Aug; 116(4):577-87. PubMed ID: 12148925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.