These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11199562)

  • 1. The double arch impression technique: a solution to prevent supraocclusion in the indirect restoration.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 11199562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of successive casts for full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Dounis KS; Dounis G; Ditmyer MM; Ziebert GJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(5):446-9. PubMed ID: 20859561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
    Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeatable alignment--Part 1: Consistent model transfer record accuracy.
    Snow SR
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(1):87-93; quiz 94. PubMed ID: 12680070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Occlusal impression taking with additive-type silicones].
    Kawawa T; Terada H
    DE J Dent Eng; 1985; (73):28-31. PubMed ID: 3928275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the accuracy of two articulating methods: the double-arch impression technique vs. hand-articulated full-arch casts.
    Gregory WA; Kaplan MD
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Sep; 19(9):631-4. PubMed ID: 3077689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Jaw relation records for fixed prosthodontics.
    Squier RS
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vii, 471-86. PubMed ID: 15172611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making multiple predictable single-unit provisional restorations using an indirect technique.
    Hansen PA; Sigler E; Husemann RH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):260-3. PubMed ID: 19782829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ; Marder RW
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: occlusal considerations and articulator selection.
    Steele JG; Nohl FS; Wassell RW
    Br Dent J; 2002 Apr; 192(7):377-80, 383-7. PubMed ID: 12017458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indirect fabrication of multiple post-and-core patterns with a vinyl polysiloxane matrix.
    Sabbak SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 12474010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A quadrant tray and bite registration as an alternative to dual-arch impressions for fixed prosthetics: a clinical and dental laboratory technique.
    Hammond BD; Myers ML; Haywood VB
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 22313819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Mounting of models using the facial arch in semi-adjustable articulators].
    Collesano V; Avril C; Forniciti T; Sconocchia R
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1984; 53(7-8):513-8. PubMed ID: 6597525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Impressions in conservative dentistry].
    Charpentier J
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 16193849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The acrylic resin transfer coping technique for making accurate interocclusal records.
    Antonelli J; Hottel TL; Siegel SC; Darnell L
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2011; 91(2):17-21; quiz 22-3. PubMed ID: 21748975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.