These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11199563)

  • 1. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of cross-sectional area on transverse strength of Amalgapin-retained restorations.
    Certosimo AJ; House RC; Anderson MH
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 1803331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical evaluation of dentinal slot, amalgapin & T.M.S. retention in amalgam restorations.
    Tewari S; Govila CP; Paharia YN
    Fed Oper Dent; 1990 Aug; 1(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 2100658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of distribution of resistance features in complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Rindler EA; Robbins JW; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8008611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond.
    Fischer GM; Stewart GP; Panelli J
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 7803002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Shavell HM
    J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1980 Apr; 8(4):48-55. PubMed ID: 6935206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical versus chemical retention for restoring complex restorations: what is the evidence?
    Vaught RL
    J Dent Educ; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1356-62. PubMed ID: 17923714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amalgam buildups: shear strength and dentin sealing properties.
    Pashley EL; Comer RW; Parry EE; Pashley DH
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(3):82-9. PubMed ID: 1803337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Large restorations with silver amalgam in molars and premolars].
    Garcia Vicente L; Garcia Barbero J
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1979; 27(3):145-62. PubMed ID: 296523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention design for amalgam restorations: pins versus slots.
    Bailey JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 2033550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Robbins JW; Burgess JO; Summitt JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.
    Burke FJ; Shaglouf AG; Combe EC; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 11203847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations with peripheral shelves used as resistance features.
    Reagan SE; Gray SE; Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Oct; 6(5):225-8. PubMed ID: 7880463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Complex amalgam reconstruction. II].
    Pescarmona G; Fuzzi M
    Dent Cadmos; 1985 Feb; 53(3):17, 19, 21-7 passim. PubMed ID: 3894070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-threading pins and amalgapins compared in resistance form for complex amalgam restorations.
    Davis SP; Summitt JB; Mayhew RB; Hawley RJ
    Oper Dent; 1983; 8(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 6583666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations.
    Outhwaite WC; Garman TA; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 284120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Conservative restorations in the posterior quadrant using amalgam: indications, instrumentation and operative method. I].
    Palattella G; Mangani F; Palattella P; Carnesecchi R
    Dent Cadmos; 1986 Feb; 54(3):59-68. PubMed ID: 3460844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Performance of a tooth with amalgam for support of cast pins].
    Hirata JM
    Ars Curandi Odontol; 1977 Dec; 4(9):4-17. PubMed ID: 391200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.