These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Re-intervention in glass ionomer restorations: what comes next? Burke FJ; Lucarotti PS J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 18819740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Can current composites be used for Class I and II restorations in posterior teeth?]. Baldensperger R Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1985; 14(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 3866285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Sarrett DC Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Demarco FF; Corrêa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ Dent Mater; 2012 Jan; 28(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 22192253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Clinical behavior of posterior restorations with composite resins]. Skouta M; Kakaboura A Stomatologia (Athenai); 1991; 47(5-6):296-305. PubMed ID: 1949095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Comparison between hybrid composites and amalgam for posterior restorations]. Favero L; Berengo M; Pellegrini F G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 2485794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations. Full CA; Hollander WR ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Posterior composites for modern operative dentistry. Douglas WH J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):44-7. PubMed ID: 9120612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam. Dlugokinski M; Browning WD J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation. de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using a new condensable composite for posterior restorations. Poss SD Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (23):S14-8. PubMed ID: 12089754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems. Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years. Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F Quintessence Int; 2005 May; 36(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 15892534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools. Gordan VV; Mjör IA; Veiga Filho LC; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(10):735-40. PubMed ID: 11204001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]