These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11199757)

  • 1. Broken instrument removal--two cases.
    D'Arcangelo C; Varvara G; De Fazio P
    J Endod; 2000 Jun; 26(6):368-70. PubMed ID: 11199757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Broken instrument removal. The endodontic challenge.
    Ruddle CJ
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):70-2, 74, 76 passim. PubMed ID: 12242838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel technique for the removal of fractured instruments in the apical third of curved root canals.
    Rahimi M; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 19228217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the force required to fracture roots vertically after ultrasonic and Masserann removal of broken instruments.
    Gerek M; Başer ED; Kayahan MB; Sunay H; Kaptan RF; Bayırlı G
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 22188327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals.
    Suter B; Lussi A; Sequeira P
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 15667633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overcoming unforeseen incidents: what to do when an unlikely event occurs.
    Chikvashvili J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):44-8. PubMed ID: 21755894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: clinical cases.
    Ward JR; Parashos P; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2003 Nov; 29(11):764-7. PubMed ID: 14651286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval of a broken endodontic instrument using cyanoacrylate adhesive. Case report.
    Coutinho Filho T; Krebs RL; Berlinck TC; Galindo RG
    Braz Dent J; 1998; 9(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 9835806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating ultrasonic tips into the endodontic treatment armamentarium.
    Bahcall JK; Olsen EK
    Dent Today; 2007 May; 26(5):120, 122-3; quiz 123. PubMed ID: 17555196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction.
    Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
    Schäfer E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of fractured instruments using a combined automated/ultrasonic technique.
    Hülsmann M
    J Endod; 1994 Mar; 20(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 7996089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New techniques for removing separated root canal instruments.
    Flanders DH
    N Y State Dent J; 1996 May; 62(5):30-2. PubMed ID: 8692460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of a newly designed ultrasonic unit and tips in reducing temperature rise on root surface during the removal of fractured files.
    Madarati AA; Qualtrough AJ; Watts DC
    J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):896-9. PubMed ID: 19482194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The causes, prevention, and clinical management of broken endodontic rotary files.
    Bahcall JK; Carp S; Miner M; Skidmore L
    Dent Today; 2005 Nov; 24(11):74, 76, 78-80; quiz 80. PubMed ID: 16358801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effectiveness of the F-file versus ultrasonic activation of a K-file to remove smear layer.
    Chopra S; Murray PE; Namerow KN
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1243-5. PubMed ID: 18793930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature.
    van der Sluis LW; Versluis M; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):415-26. PubMed ID: 17442017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of instrumentation with two different file types, each with 2.5% NaOCl irrigation on the microhardness of root dentin.
    Slutzky-Goldberg I; Liberman R; Heling I
    J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):311-2. PubMed ID: 12043870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.