These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. Calt S; Serper A J Endod; 2002 Jan; 28(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11806642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of different concentrations of EDTA on instrumented root canal walls. Sen BH; Ertürk O; Pişkin B Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 19699113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The removal of the smear layer using EGTA: a scanning electron microscopic study. Viswanath D; Hegde AM; Munshi AK J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 28(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 14604146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of EDTA, EGTA, EDTAC, and tetracycline-HCl with and without subsequent NaOCl treatment on the microhardness of root canal dentin. Sayin TC; Serper A; Cehreli ZC; Otlu HG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 17709073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth. da Silva LA; Sanguino AC; Rocha CT; Leonardo MR; Silva RA J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1541-4. PubMed ID: 19026891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of calcium hydroxide and four irrigation regimens on instrumented and uninstrumented canal wall topography. Tatsuta CT; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC; Adey JD J Endod; 1999 Feb; 25(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 10204464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals. Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study. Hariharan VS; Nandlal B; Srilatha KT J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 21273715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer. Lottanti S; Gautschi H; Sener B; Zehnder M Int Endod J; 2009 Apr; 42(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 19220516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal. Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion in apical intraradicular dentine with three irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Mancini M; Armellin E; Casaglia A; Cerroni L; Cianconi L J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):900-3. PubMed ID: 19482195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA. O'Connell MS; Morgan LA; Beeler WJ; Baumgartner JC J Endod; 2000 Dec; 26(12):739-43. PubMed ID: 11471645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. Torabinejad M; Khademi AA; Babagoli J; Cho Y; Johnson WB; Bozhilov K; Kim J; Shabahang S J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12669874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A comparative study of root smear layer removal using different pH EDTA salts]. Ma R; Liu Z; Zhu CL Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Jun; 12(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 14661329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal. Khedmat S; Shokouhinejad N J Endod; 2008 May; 34(5):599-602. PubMed ID: 18436043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a low-concentration EDTA solution on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic study. Perez F; Rouqueyrol-Pourcel N Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 15716850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]