271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11199779)
1. Smear layer removal by EGTA.
Calt S; Serper A
J Endod; 2000 Aug; 26(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 11199779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures.
Calt S; Serper A
J Endod; 2002 Jan; 28(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11806642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of different concentrations of EDTA on instrumented root canal walls.
Sen BH; Ertürk O; Pişkin B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):622-7. PubMed ID: 19699113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The removal of the smear layer using EGTA: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Viswanath D; Hegde AM; Munshi AK
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 28(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 14604146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of EDTA, EGTA, EDTAC, and tetracycline-HCl with and without subsequent NaOCl treatment on the microhardness of root canal dentin.
Sayin TC; Serper A; Cehreli ZC; Otlu HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 17709073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.
da Silva LA; Sanguino AC; Rocha CT; Leonardo MR; Silva RA
J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1541-4. PubMed ID: 19026891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of calcium hydroxide and four irrigation regimens on instrumented and uninstrumented canal wall topography.
Tatsuta CT; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC; Adey JD
J Endod; 1999 Feb; 25(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 10204464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study.
Hariharan VS; Nandlal B; Srilatha KT
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 21273715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer.
Lottanti S; Gautschi H; Sener B; Zehnder M
Int Endod J; 2009 Apr; 42(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 19220516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal.
Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL
Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion in apical intraradicular dentine with three irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation.
Mancini M; Armellin E; Casaglia A; Cerroni L; Cianconi L
J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):900-3. PubMed ID: 19482195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of smear layer removal using different salts of EDTA.
O'Connell MS; Morgan LA; Beeler WJ; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 2000 Dec; 26(12):739-43. PubMed ID: 11471645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer.
Torabinejad M; Khademi AA; Babagoli J; Cho Y; Johnson WB; Bozhilov K; Kim J; Shabahang S
J Endod; 2003 Mar; 29(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12669874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A comparative study of root smear layer removal using different pH EDTA salts].
Ma R; Liu Z; Zhu CL
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2003 Jun; 12(3):197-9. PubMed ID: 14661329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of the EndoActivator System in removing the smear layer after root canal instrumentation.
Uroz-Torres D; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM
J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):308-11. PubMed ID: 20113797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal.
Khedmat S; Shokouhinejad N
J Endod; 2008 May; 34(5):599-602. PubMed ID: 18436043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a low-concentration EDTA solution on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Perez F; Rouqueyrol-Pourcel N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):383-7. PubMed ID: 15716850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
