These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11199805)

  • 1. Measurement of endodontic file lengths: a density profile plot analysis.
    Piepenbring ME; Potter BJ; Weller RN; Loushine RJ
    J Endod; 2000 Oct; 26(10):615-8. PubMed ID: 11199805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of endodontic file lengths: calibrated versus uncalibrated digital images.
    Loushine RJ; Weller RN; Kimbrough WF; Potter BJ
    J Endod; 2001 Dec; 27(12):779-81. PubMed ID: 11771590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements.
    de Oliveira ML; Pinto GC; Ambrosano GM; Tosoni GM
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gray scale inversion in digital image for measurement of tooth length.
    Oliveira ML; Vieira ML; Cruz AD; Bóscolo FN; DE Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 23338264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length.
    Kal BI; Baksi BG; Dündar N; Sen BH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17234548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
    Oliveira ML; Ambrosano GM; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Tosoni GM
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms.
    Li G; Sanderink GC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15140815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of high-resolution digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination in endodontics.
    Vandenberghe B; Bud M; Sutanto A; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 19452176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision.
    Herrera M; Abalos C; Planas AJ; Llamas R
    J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):995-8. PubMed ID: 17878091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiographic endodontic working length estimation: comparison of three digital image receptors.
    Athar A; Angelopoulos C; Katz JO; Williams KB; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):604-8. PubMed ID: 18718798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of artificial neural network in locating minor apical foramen: a cadaver study.
    Saghiri MA; Garcia-Godoy F; Gutmann JL; Lotfi M; Asgar K
    J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1130-4. PubMed ID: 22794221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study.
    Darda S; Manwar N; Chandak M; Shori DD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul; 10(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 19575053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II.
    Somma F; Castagnola R; Lajolo C; Paternò Holtzman L; Marigo L
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 22257341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics.
    Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film.
    Cederberg RA; Tidwell E; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 9540092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of digital dental X-ray systems with self-developing film and manual processing for endodontic file length determination.
    Eikenberg S; Vandre R
    J Endod; 2000 Feb; 26(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 11194373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.