These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11201196)

  • 1. [Reproduction of interocclusal relationship on stone casts].
    Arai Y
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 67(4):322-34. PubMed ID: 11201196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and precision of occlusal contacts of stereolithographic casts mounted by digital interocclusal registrations.
    Krahenbuhl JT; Cho SH; Irelan J; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 27068319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Influence of occlusal contacts on tooth displacement for mesio-distal direction].
    Tokuda A
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 71(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15103956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of direct and indirect occlusal contact examinations with different clenching intensities.
    Komiyama O; Obara R; Iida T; Asano T; Masuda M; Uchida T; De Laat A; Kawara M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 42(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 25270097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of contacts calculated from 3D images of occlusal surfaces.
    DeLong R; Knorr S; Anderson GC; Hodges J; Pintado MR
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 17418474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical application of a prefabricated interocclusal recording cap for making interocclusal records of implant-supported fixed prostheses].
    Ding Q; Pu TT; He MZ; Wang SM; Li WJ; Zhang L; Liu JZ; Tong D; Zhou YS
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 56(12):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 34915654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D morphological assessment of occlusal treatment by measuring dental casts with a micro-focus X-ray CT.
    Kamegawa M; Nakamura M; Kitahara K; Ohtomo H; Hasegawa T; Nakakura T; Tsutsumi S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 May; 35(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 18405275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional and occlusal accuracy of a novel three-dimensional digital model of articulated dental arches.
    Tanaka Y; Hattori Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 23626985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Maximum Intercuspal Contacts of Articulated Casts and Virtual Casts Requiring Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Arslan Y; Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S; Kökdoğan Boyacı B; Aydın C
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):594-598. PubMed ID: 26848940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques.
    Parker MH; Cameron SM; Hughbanks JC; Reid DE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 9297641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of clenching level on intercuspal contact area in various regions of the dental arch.
    Gurdsapsri W; Ai M; Baba K; Fueki K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 27(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 10784336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
    Mendez AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of optical interocclusal registration using an intraoral scanner.
    Okamoto M; Tanabe N; Fukazawa S; Oyamada Y; Kondo H
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Oct; 67(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 36967125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.