326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11201956)
1. An investigation of mandibular morphology in subjects with different vertical facial growth patterns.
Eröz UB; Ceylan I; Aydemir S
Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11201956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.
Forster CM; Sunga E; Chung CH
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 18263889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An investigation of maxillary and mandibular morphology in different overjet groups.
Baydaş B; Yavuz I; Dağsuyu IM; Bölükbaşi B; Ceylan I
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 15233582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association between facial height development and mandibular growth rotation in low and high MP-SN angle faces: a longitudinal study.
Karlsen AT
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 9107374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns.
Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of Pont's Index to a Jordanian population.
Al-Omari IK; Duaibis RB; Al-Bitar ZB
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):627-31. PubMed ID: 17971353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth.
Hesby RM; Marshall SD; Dawson DV; Southard KA; Casko JS; Franciscus RG; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17169734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The application and correlation of Pont's Index to the facial framework of three main ethnic groups in Malaysia.
Purmal K; Alam MK; Moganadass DD; Zakariat NN; Cheong NW
Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 23785936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study on morphology of mandibular corpus and ramus influencing the eruption of mandibular first permanent molar.
Lin YF
Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1993 Mar; 40(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 8462118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of the curve of Spee.
Marshall SD; Caspersen M; Hardinger RR; Franciscus RG; Aquilino SA; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 18774080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linear and angular filipino cephalometric norms according to age and sex.
Moldez MA; Sato K; Sugawara J; Mitani H
Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):800-5. PubMed ID: 17029513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Craniofacial growth differences between low and high MP-SN angle males: a longitudinal study.
Karlsen AT
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):341-50. PubMed ID: 8526293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
