These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11201964)

  • 1. A comparison of retention rates of brackets with thermally-cured and light-cured custom bases in indirect bonding procedures.
    Miles PG
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Jul; 16(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 11201964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two indirect bonding adhesives.
    Miles PG; Weyant RJ
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1019-23. PubMed ID: 16448248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on the bond failure rate of orthodontic brackets in vivo.
    Varlik SK; Demirbaş E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):144.e1-4; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 19201317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Light-emitting diode vs halogen light curing of orthodontic brackets: a 15-month clinical study of bond failures.
    Krishnaswamy NR; Sunitha C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):518-23. PubMed ID: 17920506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontic composite resin bond strength with conventional light and Power Slot curing.
    Garino F; Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF
    Prog Orthod; 2003; 4(2):38-49. PubMed ID: 14985796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical applications of direct orthodontic bonding systems.
    Whitehill-Grayson IT
    Dent Clin North Am; 1981 Apr; 25(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 7018940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of bracket base conditioning.
    Faltermeier A; Behr M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):12.e1-5; discussion 12-3. PubMed ID: 19121493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to deciduous and permanent teeth.
    Endo T; Ozoe R; Shinkai K; Shimomura J; Katoh Y; Shimooka S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 18675200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of bracket bonding using two different polymerization sources.
    Koupis NS; Eliades T; Athanasiou AE
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):922-5. PubMed ID: 18298204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength analysis of custom base variables in indirect bonding techniques.
    Thompson MA; Drummond JL; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):9.e15-20. PubMed ID: 18174062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel.
    Adanir N; Türkkahraman H; Yalçin Güngör A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 19073952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indirect bonding--do custom bases need a plastic conditioner? A randomised clinical trial.
    Miles P
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 21175018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems.
    Pannes DD; Bailey DK; Thompson JY; Pietz DM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 12589289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Six-month bracket failure rate evaluation of a self-etching primer.
    Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Turk T; Cakmak F
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 18216373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indirect bonding with a flowable light-cured adhesive.
    Miles PG
    J Clin Orthod; 2002 Nov; 36(11):646-7. PubMed ID: 12514856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Six and 12 months' evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomized clinical trial.
    Aljubouri YD; Millett DT; Gilmour WH
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 26(6):565-71. PubMed ID: 15650064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study.
    Eslamian L; Ghassemi A; Amini F; Jafari A; Afrand M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 19193708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.