137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11202250)
1. Improved differentiation of the ventricular evoked response from polarization by modification of the pacemaker impulse.
Provenier F; Germonpré E; De Wagter X
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Dec; 23(12):2073-7. PubMed ID: 11202250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-energy epicardial pacing in children: the benefit of autocapture.
Bauersfeld U; Nowak B; Molinari L; Malm T; Kampmann C; Schönbeck MH; Schüller H
Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Oct; 68(4):1380-3. PubMed ID: 10543510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing threshold tracking: a North American multicenter study. Clinical Investigators of the Microny-Regency Clinical Evaluation Study.
Lau C; Cameron DA; Nishimura SC; Ahern T; Freedman RA; Ellenbogen K; Greenberg S; Baker J; Meacham D
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Jun; 23(6):953-9. PubMed ID: 10879378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compatibility of automatic threshold tracking pacemakers with previously implanted pacing leads in children.
Kucukosmanoglu O; Celiker A; Ozer S; Karagoz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Nov; 25(11):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12494622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Autocapture enhancements: unipolar and bipolar lead compatibility and bipolar pacing capability on bipolar leads.
Binner L; Messenger J; Sperzel J; Bondke H; Vandekerckhove Y; Poore J; Scheiner J; Berkhof M; Park E; Holmström N; Bornzin GA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):221-4. PubMed ID: 12687816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjustment of the evoked response sensitivity after hospital discharge in pacemaker patients with automatic ventricular threshold tracking activated.
Schuchert A; Ventura R; Meinertz T;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Feb; 24(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 11270702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study.
Verma PK; Sharma JK; Khan IA; Bali HK; Varma JS; Bhargava M; Sharma YP; Grover A
Indian Heart J; 2001; 53(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 11759937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute effects of a class IA antiarrhythmic drug on the ventricular evoked response amplitude in patients with cardiac pacemakers.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T
Cardiology; 2000; 94(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 11173781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations of the AutoCapture™ Pacing System in patients with cardiac stimulation devices.
Benezet-Mazuecos J; Iglesias JA; Rubio JM; Cortés M; de la Cruz E; de la Vieja JJ; Calle S; Farré J
Europace; 2014 Oct; 16(10):1469-75. PubMed ID: 24789975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic adjustment of pacemaker stimulation output correlated with continuously monitored capture thresholds: a multicenter study. European Microny Study Group.
Clarke M; Liu B; Schüller H; Binner L; Kennergren C; Guerola M; Weinmann P; Ohm OJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Aug; 21(8):1567-75. PubMed ID: 9725155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of body position and exercise on evoked response signal for automatic threshold activation.
Schuchert A; Ventura R; Meinertz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1476-80. PubMed ID: 10588149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Autocapture compatibility in patients with the MembraneEX lead and Affinity pulse generators.
Schuchert A; Voitk J; Liu B; Kolk R; Stammwitz E; Beiras J;
Europace; 2001 Oct; 3(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 11678393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic reduction of stimulus polarization artifact for accurate evaluation of ventricular evoked responses.
Curtis AB; Vance F; Miller K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Apr; 14(4 Pt 1):529-37. PubMed ID: 1710058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Autocapture(TM) and Capture Management(TM) Current concepts in pacing threshold and output management].
Anelli-Monti M; Mächler H; Oberwalder P; Dacar D; Knez I; Salaymeh L; Streinu C; Rigler B
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2001 Dec; 12(4):186-94. PubMed ID: 27432388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atrial evoked response integral for automatic capture verification in atrial pacing.
Boriani G; Biffi M; Cameron D; Datteri S; Snell J; Holmström N; Park E; Bornzin GA
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):248-52. PubMed ID: 12687822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic threshold tracking activation without the intraoperative evaluation of the evoked response amplitude. AUTOCAP Investigators.
Schuchert A; Ventura R; Meinertz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Mar; 23(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 10750131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial experience with an autocapture pacemaker system.
Kam RM; Tan CS; Teo WS
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2000 Nov; 29(6):732-4. PubMed ID: 11269979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term results of endocardial pacing with Autocapture threshold tracking pacemakers in children.
Celiker A; Ceviz N; Küçükosmanoğlu O
Europace; 2005 Nov; 7(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 16216759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Threshold tracking pacing based on beat by beat evoked response detection: clinical benefits and potential problems.
Duru F; Bauersfeld U; Schüller H; Candinas R
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2000 Oct; 4(3):511-22. PubMed ID: 11046190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pacing with capture verification in candidates for resynchronisation therapy: a feasibility study.
Biffi M; Boriani G; Bertini M; Silvestri P; Martignani C; Branzi A
Europace; 2005 May; 7(3):255-65. PubMed ID: 15878565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
