These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11202585)

  • 1. Predictors of non-attendance for second round mammography in an Australian mammographic screening programme.
    O'Byrne AM; Kavanagh AM; Ugoni A; Diver F
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 11202585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of returning for second round screening at a population based mammographic screening programme in Melbourne, Australia.
    Cockburn J; Schofield P; White V; Hill D; Russell I
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Feb; 51(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 9135790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
    Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening.
    Kavanagh AM; Mitchell H; Giles GG
    Lancet; 2000 Jan; 355(9200):270-4. PubMed ID: 10675074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monitoring interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme.
    Kavanagh AM; Mitchell H; Farrugia H; Giles GG
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 10572844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of attendance at a relocatable mammography service for rural women.
    Cockburn J; Sutherland M; Cappiello M; Hevern M
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1997 Dec; 21(7):739-42. PubMed ID: 9489192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening.
    Aro AR; de Koning HJ; Absetz P; Schreck M
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 10444726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Early effects of attendance to the Friuli Venezia Giulia (Northern Italy) mammography screening programme on the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer: a cohort study].
    Giudici F; Bortul M; Clagnan E; Del Zotto S; Franzo A; Giordano L; Gobbato M; Puliti D; Serraino D; Zucchetto A; Zanier L; Zanconati F; Bucchi L
    Epidemiol Prev; 2020; 44(2-3):145-153. PubMed ID: 32631014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in Australia: an aggregate cohort study.
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Roder D; Dobson A
    J Med Screen; 2012 Mar; 19(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22345322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of re-attendance at biennial screening mammography following a false positive referral: A study among women in the south of the Netherlands.
    Voogd AC; Molnar Z; Nederend J; Schipper RJ; Strobbe LJA; Duijm LEM
    Breast; 2024 Apr; 74():103702. PubMed ID: 38447293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of screening mammography and symptomatic status.
    Kavanagh AM; Giles GG; Mitchell H; Cawson JN
    J Med Screen; 2000; 7(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 11002452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening--a population-based register study (Sweden).
    Lagerlund M; Maxwell AE; Bastani R; Thurfjell E; Ekbom A; Lambe M
    Cancer Causes Control; 2002 Feb; 13(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 11899121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance.
    Brett J; Austoker J
    J Public Health Med; 2001 Dec; 23(4):292-300. PubMed ID: 11873891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of mammographic screening of the elderly: a case-referent study in the Nijmegen program in The Netherlands.
    van Dijck JA; Holland R; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Jun; 86(12):934-8. PubMed ID: 8196083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Service screening with mammography of women aged 50-69 years in Sweden: effects on mortality from breast cancer.
    Jonsson H; Nyström L; Törnberg S; Lenner P
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 11678556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hormone replacement therapy, percent mammographic density, and sensitivity of mammography.
    Kavanagh AM; Cawson J; Byrnes GB; Giles GG; Marr G; Tong B; Gertig DM; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1060-4. PubMed ID: 15894653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.
    Schofield PE; Cockburn J; Hill DJ; Reading D
    J Med Screen; 1994 Jul; 1(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8790507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting participation in mammography screening.
    McNoe B; Richardson AK; Elwood JM
    N Z Med J; 1996 Sep; 109(1030):359-61. PubMed ID: 8890861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.