BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11202595)

  • 1. Evaluating the implications of clinical practice guidelines for patient care.
    Hoelzer S; Fremgen AM; Stewart A; Reiners C; Dudeck J
    Am J Med Qual; 2001; 16(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 11202595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of medical-decision making and the use of standards of care in oncology.
    Holzer S; Fremgen AM; Hundahl SA; Dudeck J
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():364-8. PubMed ID: 11079906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Patient care evaluation studies--a comprehensive concept for evaluation of oncologic patient management].
    Hölzer S; Dudeck J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Mar; 94(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 10782507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of guidelines in oncology].
    Hölzel D; Engel J; Schmidt M
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Jan; 93(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10198973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The NCCN guideline program--1998.
    Winn RJ; Botnick WZ; Brown NH
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1998 Nov; 12(11A):30-4. PubMed ID: 10028501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tumor boards: optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide.
    El Saghir NS; Keating NL; Carlson RW; Khoury KE; Fallowfield L
    Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book; 2014; ():e461-6. PubMed ID: 24857140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.
    Neuss MN; Desch CE; McNiff KK; Eisenberg PD; Gesme DH; Jacobson JO; Jahanzeb M; Padberg JJ; Rainey JM; Guo JJ; Simone JV
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep; 23(25):6233-9. PubMed ID: 16087948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology.
    Schnipper LE; Smith TJ; Raghavan D; Blayney DW; Ganz PA; Mulvey TM; Wollins DS
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 May; 30(14):1715-24. PubMed ID: 22493340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Inpatient medical rehabilitation in diabetes mellitus in light of evidence based practice guidelines: an evaluation on the basis of BfA routine data].
    Ganten JU; Raspe HH
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Apr; 42(2):94-108. PubMed ID: 12701002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using practice guidelines to assess cancer care quality.
    Bach PB
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9041-3. PubMed ID: 16301594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Patient-oriented, treatment-accompanying documentation as a basis for evaluation with medical oncology as an example].
    Hölzer S; Wächter W; Dudeck J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):759-64. PubMed ID: 11127784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Australian survey of current practice and guideline use in adult cancer pain assessment and management: perspectives of oncologists.
    Luckett T; Davidson PM; Boyle F; Liauw W; Agar M; Green A; Lovell M;
    Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jun; 10(2):e99-107. PubMed ID: 23253101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
    Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
    Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Measuring quality in the German Guideline Programme in Oncology (GGPO)—methodology and implementation].
    Nothacker M; Muche-Borowski C; Kopp IB
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(8-9):470-80. PubMed ID: 25523845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The changing landscape of cancer care - the impact of psychosocial clinical practice guidelines.
    Turner J
    Psychooncology; 2015 Apr; 24(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 25858439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. European cooperation for clinical practice guidelines in cancer.
    Philip T; Fervers B; Haugh M; Otter R; Browman G
    Br J Cancer; 2003 Aug; 89 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-3. PubMed ID: 12915895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Building Data Infrastructure to Evaluate and Improve Quality: The National Cancer Data Base and the Commission on Cancer's Quality Improvement Programs.
    Shulman LN; McCabe R; Gay G; Palis B; McKellar D
    J Oncol Pract; 2015 May; 11(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 25901051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know.
    Nishino M; Jagannathan JP; Ramaiya NH; Van den Abbeele AD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 20651182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.
    Blayney DW; McNiff K; Hanauer D; Miela G; Markstrom D; Neuss M
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Aug; 27(23):3802-7. PubMed ID: 19487377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of oncology clinical practice guidelines: the contribution of certified centers].
    Wesselmann S
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 26474651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.