These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11202876)

  • 1. An in vitro investigation into the cutting action of ultrasonic radicular access preparation instruments.
    Waplington M; Lumley PJ; Blunt L
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 2000 Aug; 16(4):158-61. PubMed ID: 11202876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cutting ability of an ultrasonic retrograde cavity preparation instrument.
    Waplington M; Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Blunt L
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1995 Aug; 11(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 7588341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Er:YAG Laser, ultrasonic system, and curette produce different profiles on dentine root surfaces: an in vitro study.
    de Mendonça AC; Máximo MB; Rodrigues JA; Arrais CA; de Freitas PM; Duarte PM
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Apr; 26(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 18307394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro study comparing root-end cavities prepared by diamond-coated and stainless steel ultrasonic retrotips.
    Peters CI; Peters OA; Barbakow F
    Int Endod J; 2001 Mar; 34(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 11307263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the cutting efficiency of two ultrasonic units utilizing two different tips at two different power settings.
    Paz E; Satovsky J; Moldauer I
    J Endod; 2005 Nov; 31(11):824-6. PubMed ID: 16249728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentine chips produced by nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Guppy DR; Curtis RV; Ford TR
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 2000 Dec; 16(6):258-64. PubMed ID: 11202891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of dentin cutting efficiency of 4 round-tipped ultrasonic instruments.
    Cottle E; Kulild JC; Walker MP
    J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1051-3. PubMed ID: 23880275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cutting efficiency of orthograde ultrasonic tips by using a nonstatic model.
    Dentkos TR; Berzins DW
    J Endod; 2008 Jul; 34(7):863-5. PubMed ID: 18570997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of diamond-coated ultrasonic instruments for root-end preparation.
    Brent PD; Morgan LA; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1999 Oct; 25(10):672-5. PubMed ID: 10687526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of retrograde cavity preparations on root apexes.
    Frank RJ; Antrim DD; Bakland LK
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Apr; 12(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 9028205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the dentin cutting efficiency of 4 pointed ultrasonic tips.
    Godfrey MP; Kulild JC; Walker MP
    J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):897-900. PubMed ID: 23791259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings.
    Lampe Bless K; Sener B; Dual J; Attin T; Schmidlin PR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Apr; 15(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 20127378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Root surface removal and resultant surface texture with diamond-coated ultrasonic inserts: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Vastardis S; Yukna RA; Rice DA; Mercante D
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 15842261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of root-end preparations using ultrasonic and rotary instrumentation in cadavers.
    Gray GJ; Hatton JF; Holtzmann DJ; Jenkins DB; Nielsen CJ
    J Endod; 2000 May; 26(5):281-3. PubMed ID: 11199736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Ultrasonic root planing. An alternative method versus hand instruments? An in vitro comparison and SEM study].
    van Gogswaardt DC; Behrens VG
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 2150253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro investigation into the cutting ability of ultrasonic K files.
    Lumley PJ; Walmsley AD; Thomas A
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1994 Dec; 10(6):264-7. PubMed ID: 7867614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from different-sized simulated plastic root canals.
    Lee SJ; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):607-12. PubMed ID: 15317564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of root-end preparations.
    Gorman MC; Steiman HR; Gartner AH
    J Endod; 1995 Mar; 21(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 7561651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.