231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11202951)
1. Unicef and baby food manufacturers. Unicef continues to base its actions and programmes on the best interests of the child.
Bellamy C
BMJ; 2000 Oct; 321(7266):960. PubMed ID: 11202951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IBFAN: on the cutting edge.
Allain A
Dev Dialogue; 1989; (2):5-38. PubMed ID: 12343253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Celebrating 25 years of the WHO/UNICEF international code of marketing of breast milk substitutes].
Martin J
Rev Med Suisse; 2006 Aug; 2(76):1932-4. PubMed ID: 16972544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Infant and young child feeding: an analysis of the WHO/UNICEF meeting.
Baer E; Margulies L
Stud Fam Plann; 1980 Feb; 11(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 7376238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The baby killers are still at large.
Power J
Sun; 1994 Aug; ():21A. PubMed ID: 12319575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Legislation to protect breast feeding.
Biddulph J
P N G Med J; 1983 Mar; 26(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 6585107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unicef and baby food manufacturers. Compliance to the code is difficult to judge.
Rundall P; Peck NJ
BMJ; 2000 Oct; 321(7266):960-1. PubMed ID: 11202952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. IBFAN Africa training initiatives: code implementation and lactation management.
Mbuli A
Mothers Child; 1994; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 12287932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. WHO board endorses battle against bottle.
Allain A
Dev Forum; 1981 Apr; 9(3):15. PubMed ID: 12337548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Programmes proposed by UNICEF in support of breast-feeding.
UNICEF
Assignment Child; 1981 Feb; 55-56():19-24. PubMed ID: 12264012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The dangers of "follow-up" feeds.
Greiner T
Dialogue Diarrhoea; 1991 Sep; (46):4. PubMed ID: 12343423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Training course on code implementation.
Allain A; De Arango R
Mothers Child; 1992; 11(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 12288850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An update on the infant formula controversy.
Baer E
Stud Fam Plann; 1983 Apr; 14(4):119-22. PubMed ID: 6612765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do baby-friendly hospitals influence breastfeeding duration on a national level?
Merten S; Dratva J; Ackermann-Liebrich U
Pediatrics; 2005 Nov; 116(5):e702-8. PubMed ID: 16263985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast milk substitutes in Hong Kong.
Nelson EA; Chan CW; Yu CM
J Paediatr Child Health; 2004 Jul; 40(7):350-2. PubMed ID: 15228560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Milk and social media: online communities and the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes.
Abrahams SW
J Hum Lact; 2012 Aug; 28(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 22674963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. UNICEF supports birth control despite Holy See.
Deen T
Popline; 1992; 14():3-4. PubMed ID: 12317622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of international code of marketing breast-milk substitutes in China.
Liu A; Dai Y; Xie X; Chen L
Breastfeed Med; 2014 Nov; 9(9):467-72. PubMed ID: 25026262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychological factors in breast feeding versus bottle feeding in the Third World.
Berry N; Mccullough M
Bull Br Psychol Soc; 1982 Sep; 35():355. PubMed ID: 12264707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF-recommended replacement milks for infants of HIV-infected mothers appropriate in the South African context?
Papathakis PC; Rollins NC
Bull World Health Organ; 2004 Mar; 82(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 15112004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
