These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203521)

  • 1. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins.
    Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Chen HY; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2000 Jan; 16(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 11203521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials.
    Manhart J; Kunzelmann KH; Chen HY; Hickel R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000; 53(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 10898876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations.
    Thomaidis S; Kakaboura A; Mueller WD; Zinelis S
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):e132-41. PubMed ID: 23790281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I: in vitro investigations.
    Frankenberger R; García-Godoy F; Lohbauer U; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15810477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations.
    Manhart J; Chen HY; Hickel R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 May; 132(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 11367968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites.
    Kim KH; Ong JL; Okuno O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 12131887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins.
    Chen HY; Manhart J; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Dent Mater; 2001 May; 17(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 11257299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The volumetric fraction of inorganic particles and the flexural strength of composites for posterior teeth.
    Adabo GL; dos Santos Cruz CA; Fonseca RG; Vaz LG
    J Dent; 2003 Jul; 31(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 12799120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials.
    Say EC; Civelek A; Nobecourt A; Ersoy M; Guleryuz C
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):628-34. PubMed ID: 14531611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical Properties and Simulated Wear of Provisional Resin Materials.
    Takamizawa T; Barkmeier WW; Tsujimoto A; Scheidel D; Erickson RL; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):603-13. PubMed ID: 25405905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials.
    Schultz S; Rosentritt M; Behr M; Handel G
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Jan; 41(1):e1-10. PubMed ID: 19907723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison.
    Cobb DS; MacGregor KM; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Nov; 131(11):1610-5. PubMed ID: 11103581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro investigation of the performance of different restorative materials under cast circumferential clasps for removable dental prostheses.
    Pospiech P; Nagel F; Gebhart F; Nothdurft FP; Mitov G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Dec; 16(6):1659-67. PubMed ID: 22173722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials.
    Knobloch LA; Kerby RE; Seghi R; Berlin JS; Clelland N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Sep; 88(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 12426502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.
    Atai M; Yassini E; Amini M; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 17507087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler.
    Lu H; Lee YK; Oguri M; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 17153985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of mechanical properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental composite resins containing various mass fractions of silica nanoparticles.
    Hosseinalipour M; Javadpour J; Rezaie H; Dadras T; Hayati AN
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 19(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 19895426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Properties of packable dental composites.
    Choi KK; Ferracane JL; Hilton TJ; Charlton D
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 11323865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture Toughness, Flexural Strength, and Flexural Modulus of New CAD/CAM Resin Composite Blocks.
    Lucsanszky IJR; Ruse ND
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 31702090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.