199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203536)
1. Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions.
Teraoka F; Takahashi J
Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11203536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of four different die materials before and after disinfection of the impression: an in vitro study.
Nandini Y; Vinitha KB; Manvi S; Smitha M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 24309347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
Ishida K
Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of different impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of impressions using various elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
Singh K; Sahoo S; Prasad KD; Goel M; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 22430701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of plasma treatment on the wettability of elastomeric impression materials.
Vassilakos N; Fernandes CP; Nilner K
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 8371180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effect on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays].
Ishida K
Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 33(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 2489749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A laboratory study of dimensional changes for three elastomeric impression materials using custom and stock trays.
Boulton JL; Gage JP; Vincent PF; Basford KE
Aust Dent J; 1996 Dec; 41(6):398-404. PubMed ID: 9008997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Setting expansion of dental stone in hydrophilic addition type silicone impression].
Kakuta K; Ogura H; Miyagawa Y; Kashiwagi Y
Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1989 Sep; 8(5):736-40. PubMed ID: 2490217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques.
Al Quran FA; Rashdan BA; Zomar AA; Weiner S
Quintessence Int; 2012 Feb; 43(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 22257873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
