224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203548)
1. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients.
Harris RJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Feb; 20(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11203548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes.
de Souza SL; Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Andrade PF
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 10(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 18714934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Novaes AB; Grisi DC; Molina GO; Souza SL; Taba M; Grisi MF
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1477-84. PubMed ID: 11759858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Rahmani ME; Lades MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16685296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Root coverage with a connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft and an acellular dermal matrix graft: a clinical and histological evaluation of a case report.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1305-11. PubMed ID: 9848542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts.
Tal H; Moses O; Zohar R; Meir H; Nemcovsky C
J Periodontol; 2002 Dec; 73(12):1405-11. PubMed ID: 12546089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 2-year follow-up of root coverage using sub-pedicle acellular dermal matrix allografts and subepithelial connective tissue autografts.
Hirsch A; Goldstein M; Goultschin J; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
J Periodontol; 2005 Aug; 76(8):1323-8. PubMed ID: 16101365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study.
Paolantonio M; Dolci M; Esposito P; D'Archivio D; Lisanti L; Di Luccio A; Perinetti G
J Periodontol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1299-307. PubMed ID: 12479634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Root coverage using Alloderm acellular dermal graft material.
Henderson RD; Drisko CH; Greenwell H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 1999 Nov; 1(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The subepithelial connective tissue graft: part II. Histologic healing and clinical root coverage.
Sedon CL; Breault LG; Covington LL; Bishop BG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 15915213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Connective tissue grafts combined with either double pedicle grafts or coronally positioned pedicle grafts: results of 266 consecutively treated defects in 200 patients.
Harris RJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Oct; 22(5):463-71. PubMed ID: 12449306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of three techniques to obtain root coverage on mandibular incisors.
Harris RJ; Miller LH; Harris CR; Miller RJ
J Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 76(10):1758-67. PubMed ID: 16253099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):734-43. PubMed ID: 15212356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of two root-coverage techniques with regard to interdental papilla dimension as a prognostic factor.
Haghighati F; Mousavi M; Moslemi N; Kebria MM; Golestan B
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Apr; 29(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 19408480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Root coverage in isolated gingival recessions using autograft versus allograft: a pilot study.
Joly JC; Carvalho AM; da Silva RC; Ciotti DL; Cury PR
J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):1017-22. PubMed ID: 17539714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft.
Henderson RD; Greenwell H; Drisko C; Regennitter FJ; Lamb JW; Mehlbauer MJ; Goldsmith LJ; Rebitski G
J Periodontol; 2001 May; 72(5):571-82. PubMed ID: 11394391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of 3 techniques to augment keratinized tissue without root coverage.
Harris RJ
J Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 72(7):932-8. PubMed ID: 11495142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acellular dermal matrix seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts for the treatment of gingival recession: a proof-of-concept study.
Jhaveri HM; Chavan MS; Tomar GB; Deshmukh VL; Wani MR; Miller PD
J Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 20367104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
