These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203623)

  • 1. Water sorption and flexural properties of a composite resin cement.
    Ortengren U; Elgh U; Spasenoska V; Milleding P; Haasum J; Karlsson S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 11203623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the flexural strength of five adhesive resin cements.
    Pace LL; Hummel SK; Marker VA; Bolouri A
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flexural properties of eight flowable light-cured restorative materials, in immediate vs 24-hour water storage.
    Tjandrawinata R; Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 15853111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite.
    Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 12473997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of some properties of two fiber-reinforced composite materials.
    Lassila LV; Tezvergil A; Lahdenperä M; Alander P; Shinya A; Shinya A; Vallittu PK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Aug; 63(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 16040441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A partially aromatic urethane dimethacrylate as a new substitute for Bis-GMA in restorative composites.
    Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 17767952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements.
    Saskalauskaite E; Tam LE; McComb D
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 18086139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ; Santana FR; Pereira JC; Araujo TS; Menezes MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of veneering composite composition on the efficacy of fiber-reinforced restorations (FRR).
    Ellakwa A; Shortall A; Shehata M; Marquis P
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 11551011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flexural properties of the bulk fiber-reinforced composite DC-tell used in fixed partial dentures.
    Lastumäki TM; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 11842900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of water storage on the flexural properties of three glass fiber-reinforced composites.
    Chai J; Takahashi Y; Hisama K; Shimizu H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 15754889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of polymerization mode on flexural properties of esthetic resin luting agents.
    Lu H; Mehmood A; Chow A; Powers JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 16316801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix.
    Bae JM; Kim KN; Hattori M; Hasegawa K; Yoshinari M; Kawada E; Oda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11842902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bis-(acrylamide)s as new cross-linkers for resin-based composite restoratives.
    Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1157-62. PubMed ID: 16386292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microhardness and surface topography of a composite resin cement after water storage.
    Milleding P; Ahlgren F; Wennerberg A; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 9588987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of rigid rod polymer filler on mechanical properties of poly-methyl methacrylate denture base material.
    Vuorinen AM; Dyer SR; Lassila LV; Vallittu PK
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):708-13. PubMed ID: 17888507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems.
    Dunn WJ; Söderholm KJ
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 11803994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of water storage on the flexural properties of E-glass and silica fiber acrylic resin composite.
    Vallittu PK; Ruyter IE; Ekstrand K
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(4):340-50. PubMed ID: 9758998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of 180 days of water storage on the transverse strength of acetal resin denture base material.
    Arikan A; Ozkan YK; Arda T; Akalin B
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jan; 19(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 20002973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.