866 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203625)
1. Materials for interocclusal records and their ability to reproduce a 3-dimensional jaw relationship.
Ockert-Eriksson G; Eriksson A; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11203625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical factors and clinical variation influencing the reproducibility of interocclusal recording methods.
Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
Br Dent J; 2002 Apr; 192(7):395-400; discussion 391. PubMed ID: 12017459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of interocclusal recording for mandibular removable partial denture in bilateral distal extension cases.
Togano H; Hideshima M; Ohyama T
J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12715920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records.
Vergos VK; Tripodakis AP
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 12956489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids.
Sedda M; Casarotto A; Raustia A; Borracchini A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):59-66. PubMed ID: 18473028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloids (alginates) for fixed prosthodontics. A comparison between irreversible hydrocolloid, reversible hydrocolloid, and addition silicone for use in the syringe-tray technique.
Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P
Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Apr; 106(2 Pt 1):651-60. PubMed ID: 9584912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The altered cast impression technique: anatomic and functional considerations.
Stillwell KD
Todays FDA; 2009 Aug; 21(8):19-21, 23. PubMed ID: 19728461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A three-visit, complete-denture technique utilizing visible light-cured resin for tray and base plate construction.
Ling BC
Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 15119715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cast articulation accuracy using rigid cast stabilization.
Gunderson RB; Siegel SC
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 12087549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simple and functional--an impression method for the distal extension RPD.
Stillwell KD
Todays FDA; 2009 Jun; 21(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 19663052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The corrected cast impression: an alternative technique.
Walton JN
Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):779-81. PubMed ID: 20830890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Jaw relation records for fixed prosthodontics.
Squier RS
Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vii, 471-86. PubMed ID: 15172611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
Dubal RK; Friel T; Taylor PD
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
