530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203631)
1. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
Molin MK; Karlsson SL
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
Otto T; Schneider D
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
Krämer N; Ebert J; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Luting composite thickness of two ceramic inlay systems.
Sertgöz A; Gemalmaz D; Alkumru H; Yoruç B
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Jun; 3(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8601157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.
Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Rubo JH; Santos GC
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 22856680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eight-year outcome of posterior inlay-retained all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
Harder S; Wolfart S; Eschbach S; Kern M
J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):875-81. PubMed ID: 20691750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year evaluation of two resin-retained ceramic systems: a retrospective study in a general practice setting.
Arnelund CF; Johansson A; Ericson M; Häger P; Fyrberg KA
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 15237876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of 1 fiber-reinforced composite and 2 all-ceramic inlay fixed partial denture systems.
Monaco C; Krejci I; Bortolotto T; Perakis N; Ferrari M; Scotti R
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 16900821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.
Lange RT; Pfeiffer P
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study.
Taschner M; Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Breschi L; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 22236770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic onlays: a 4-year retrospective study.
Naeselius K; Arnelund CF; Molin MK
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18350945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
Krämer N; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
