BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203635)

  • 1. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants.
    DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface detail reproduction of Type IV dental stones with selected polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Schelb E; Cavazos E; Troendle KB; Prihoda TJ
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1784720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compatibility of a new epoxy resin with impression materials.
    Schelb E; Baracat SA; Almaguer R
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 2076244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
    Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental stone and improved dental stone surface hardness: the effect of the addition of potassium salts.
    Diakoyanni IN; Kaloyannides AM; Panagiotouni EG
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Dec; 1(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 1306740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wettability of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai JY; Yeung TC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 1817528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wettability of elastomeric impression materials: effect of selected surfactants.
    McCormick JT; Antony SJ; Dial ML; Duncanson MG; Shillingburg HT
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 2640120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD; Sutow EJ; MacSween R
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 1781880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and smoothness of gypsum die stones with reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Nicholson RJ; Soelberg KB; Stark MM; Kempler D; Leung RL
    Oper Dent; 1977; 2(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 275796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wettability of elastomeric impression materials and voids in gypsum casts.
    Cullen DR; Mikesell JW; Sandrik JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 1774689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between critical convergence angle and surface defects in stone casts.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Aug; 21(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 2094872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Rheological properties of elastomeric impression materials].
    Kikuchi M
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1287-302. PubMed ID: 2135157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compatibility of impressions and die stone material.
    Omana HM; Rinne VW; Truong TT
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(3):82-5. PubMed ID: 2133931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detail reproduction of soft tissue: a comparison of impression materials.
    Pratten DH; Novetsky M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):188-91. PubMed ID: 2051353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary investigation of a disinfected gypsum die stone.
    Donovan T; Chee WW
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 2634410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.