156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203771)
1. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system--results at three years.
Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11203771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: results at five years.
Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):438-41. PubMed ID: 12216560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive system.
Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):290-3. PubMed ID: 9855850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in non-carious cervical lesions.
Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 18269125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
Pollington S; van Noort R
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
Folwaczny M; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ
Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions.
van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2000 Jul; 16(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 10831784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation.
van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1101-7. PubMed ID: 17113139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive.
Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl L
Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 15724760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year clinical evaluation of one-step self-etch systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 19058889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
