1332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203780)
1. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal hybrid layer in Class V restorations.
Prati C; Pashley DH; Chersoni S; Mongiorgi R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 11203821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites.
Estafan D; Estafan A; Leinfelder KF
Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 11763929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results.
Perdigão J; Anauate-Netto C; Carmo AR; Hodges JS; Cordeiro HJ; Lewgoy HR; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Amore R
Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):777-84. PubMed ID: 15553285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
