These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203788)

  • 21. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dimensional stability of two visible light-cured indirect inlay/onlay resin composite materials.
    Lynde TA; Schulman LB; Meiers JC; Whitehill JM
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):153-6. PubMed ID: 9002790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The ceramic inlay].
    Arnold M; Ernst FD; Wenzel W
    Stomatol DDR; 1974 Apr; 24(4):464-9. PubMed ID: 4525192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relation between cavity design and marginal adaptation in a machine-milled ceramic restorative system.
    Sato K; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 29(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11844028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Ayad MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of the fit of porcelain inlays.
    Qualtrough AJ; Sharp RA; Piddock V
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Jun; 4(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 9171024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites.
    Bremer BD; Geurtsen W
    Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays.
    Kawai K; Hayashi M; Torii M; Tsuchitani Y
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Oct; 126(10):1414-9. PubMed ID: 7594014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of firing cycles on the margin distortion of 3 all-ceramic crown systems.
    Balkaya MC; Cinar A; Pamuk S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):346-55. PubMed ID: 15798685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal adaptation of ceramic inserts after cementation.
    Ozcan M; Pfeiffer P; Nergiz I
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 11931135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of internal adaptation in ceramic and composite resin inlays by silicon replica technique.
    Karakaya S; Sengun A; Ozer F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 32(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 15899024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Different Methods for Inlay Production: Effect on Internal and Marginal Adaptation, Adjustment Time, and Contact Point.
    Rippe MP; Monaco C; Volpe L; Bottino MA; Scotti R; Valandro LF
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):436-444. PubMed ID: 28402732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24-month period.
    Kaytan B; Onal B; Pamir T; Tezel H
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 16252535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.