BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203821)

  • 41. Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness.
    Coelho PG; Calamia C; Harsono M; Thompson VP; Silva NR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18374973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparative microtensile bond strength and SEM analysis of bonding to wet and dry dentin.
    Nakajima M; Kanemura N; Pereira PN; Tagami J; Pashley DH
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 11764127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel.
    Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
    Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
    Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2.
    Barkmeier WW; Los SA; Triolo PT
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):289-93. PubMed ID: 8695004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of collagen removal and the use of a low-viscosity resin liner on marginal adaptation of resin composite restorations with margins in dentin.
    Montes MA; de Goes MF; Ambrosano GM; Duarte RM; Sobrinho LC
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):378-87. PubMed ID: 12877423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Scanning electron microscopy examination of 3 different adhesive systems.
    Luz MA; Arana-Chavez VE; Netto NG
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Oct; 36(9):687-94. PubMed ID: 16163871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.
    Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC
    SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Microleakage of four simplified adhesive systems under thermal and mechanical stresses.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Moura SK
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 12469753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Altered tissue contribution to interfacial bond strength with acid conditioned dentin.
    Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Oct; 7(5):243-6. PubMed ID: 7986445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dentin infiltration by three adhesive systems in clinical and laboratory conditions.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):240-4. PubMed ID: 9545876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bond strength to crown and root dentin.
    Burrow MF; Sano H; Nakajima M; Harada N; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):223-9. PubMed ID: 9545910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Resin-infiltrated-dentine--a FE-ESEM microscopy investigation.
    Eick JD; Dusevich VM; de Wet FA; van der Vyver PJ
    SADJ; 2004 Sep; 59(8):317, 319, 321-2. PubMed ID: 15559913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Morphological study of resin-dentin bonding with TEM and in-lens FESEM.
    Breschi L; Perdigão J; Lopes MM; Gobbi P; Mazzotti G
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 14579883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.