These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203828)
1. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of a hybrid composite and a polyacid-modified composite resin in Class-II restorations in deciduous molars. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Hellwig E Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 9927911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results. Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Ermiş RB Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical performance of Class II adhesive restorations in pulpectomized primary molars: 12-month results. Zulfikaroglu BT; Atac AS; Cehreli ZC J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 18505646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall. Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditioning methods in primary teeth. Turgut MD; Tekçiçek M; Olmez S Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 15470873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study. Ertugrul F; Cogulu D; Ozdemir Y; Ersin N Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up. Pollington S; van Noort R Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results. Demirci M; Ersev H; Uçok M Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars. el-Kalla IH Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 10477997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results. Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results. Cehreli ZC; Cetinguc A; Cengiz SB; Altay AN Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation. Andersson-Wenckert I; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years. Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Frankenberger R Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]