470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203844)
1. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations.
Wibowo G; Stockton L
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11572297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptation of Class II Vitremer restorations with and without primer: a morphometric study.
Gleicher H; Fuks AB; Sela J
Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(4):263-6. PubMed ID: 9783297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations.
Erhardt MC; Magalhães CS; Serra MC
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 12120778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers.
Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ
Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
