These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203849)

  • 1. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ; Wetherell JD
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18264531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocompatibility of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive compared with a glass lonomer cement and a high copper amalgam.
    Shimada Y; Seki Y; Sasafuchi Y; Arakawa M; Burrow MF; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 14753328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations.
    Bonilla E; White SN
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bonding amalgam to enamel: shear bond strength and SEM morphology.
    Dhanasomboon S; Nikaido T; Shimada Y; Tagami J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 11552167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 63.