BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203869)

  • 1. Effects of cavity form and setting expansion of refractory dies on adaptability of Class II (MO and MOD) fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Miura M; Nishimura N; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 11203869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of cavity form and setting expansion of refractory dies on adaptability of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Miura M; Nishimura N; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11203788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of wax, autopolymerized, and light-polymerized resin pattern materials.
    Iglesias A; Powers JM; Pierpont HP
    J Prosthodont; 1996 Sep; 5(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 9028225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of marginal integrity in ceramic inlays.
    Gemalmaz D; Sertgöz A; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1996 Sep; 2(2-3):465-9. PubMed ID: 9569799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fernandes Neto AJ; Giannini M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 14653281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relation between cavity design and marginal adaptation in a machine-milled ceramic restorative system.
    Sato K; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 29(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11844028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal quality of ceramic inlays after three different instrumental cavity preparation methods of the proximal boxes.
    Naumova EA; Schiml F; Arnold WH; Piwowarczyk A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):793-803. PubMed ID: 29862414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities.
    Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Folwaczny M; Hickel R
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 15536855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal adaptation of ceramic inserts after cementation.
    Ozcan M; Pfeiffer P; Nergiz I
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 11931135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microtensile bond strength to dentin and cavity adaptation of Cerec 2 inlay restoration.
    Uno S; Tanaka T; Kawamoto C; Konishi J; Sano H
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 11764827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy die material using different polymerization methods.
    Prisco R; Cozzolino G; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 19054302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC; Lee RB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of internal adaptation in ceramic and composite resin inlays by silicon replica technique.
    Karakaya S; Sengun A; Ozer F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 32(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 15899024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.