These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203869)

  • 21. Immediate dies for in-office indirect resin restorations.
    Beggs RJ
    Dent Today; 2000 Sep; 19(9):144-9. PubMed ID: 12524736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
    Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Kawamura Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro.
    Roggendorf MJ; Krämer N; Dippold C; Vosen VE; Naumann M; Jablonski-Momeni A; Frankenberger R
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1068-73. PubMed ID: 22960537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation.
    Wolfart S; Wegner SM; Al-Halabi A; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 14714835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Time-and-motion study on class II copy-milled ceramic inlays.
    Kreulen CM; Moscovich H; Dansen KA; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 10856808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal fit and microleakage of indirect inlay systems.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Baidas KM
    Am J Dent; 1993 Apr; 6(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 8397988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The marginal accuracy of the fit of fixed adhesive ceramic inlays].
    Jäger K; Henz B; Wirz J; Graber G
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(11):1304-9. PubMed ID: 2263936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM; Milot P; Ducharme P; Rose L
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems.
    Romão W; Miranda WG; Cesar PF; Braga RR
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 15088734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of a porcelain inlay system.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cramer A; Wilson NH; Roulet JF; Noack M
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(6):517-23. PubMed ID: 1817522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of adaptation of ceramic inlays using optical coherence tomography and replica technique.
    Ayse Gozde T; Metin S; Mubin U
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Feb; 32():e005. PubMed ID: 29412222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Different Methods for Inlay Production: Effect on Internal and Marginal Adaptation, Adjustment Time, and Contact Point.
    Rippe MP; Monaco C; Volpe L; Bottino MA; Scotti R; Valandro LF
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(4):436-444. PubMed ID: 28402732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
    Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
    da Costa JB; Pelogia F; Hagedorn B; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.