214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203902)
1. A 3-year follow-up study of preformed beta-quartz glass-ceramic insert restorations.
Sjögren G; Hedlund SO; Jonsson C; Sandström A
Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11203902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
Olmez A; Oztaş N; Bilici S
Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):725-9. PubMed ID: 10200722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Kawamura Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
Rada RE
Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations.
Lange RT; Pfeiffer P
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):263-72. PubMed ID: 19544814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
Malament KA; Socransky SS
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
Otto T; Schneider D
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
Krämer N; Ebert J; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
Molin MK; Karlsson SL
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal microleakage around class V cavities restored with glass ceramic inserts of different coefficients of thermal expansion.
Tan CL; Santini A
J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15974221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Cerana prefabricated ceramic inlays.
Odman P
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 11887604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Buchalla W; Mönting JS
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations.
Beier US; Kapferer I; Dumfahrt H
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22259801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical examination of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns (Empress) in general practice: a retrospective study.
Sjögren G; Lantto R; Granberg A; Sundström BO; Tillberg A
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 10371913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
