These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11203992)

  • 1. Use of a compomer in Class V restoration: a microleakage study.
    Tung FF; Estafan D; Scherer W
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):668-72. PubMed ID: 11203992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: an in vitro investigation.
    Tung FF; Estafan D; Scherer W
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jun; 31(6):430-4. PubMed ID: 11203962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.
    Evancusky JW; Meiers JC
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10730285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of dentin deproteinization on microleakage of Class V composite restorations.
    Toledano M; Perdigão J; Osorio R; Osorio E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 11203862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems.
    Bedran de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evaluation of compomers in Class V restorations.
    Chersoni S; Lorenzi R; Ferrieri P; Prati C
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9545890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of a packable composite associated with different materials.
    Loguercio AD; Bauer JR; Reis A; Rodrigues Filho LE; Busato AL
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 11887513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
    Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
    Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents.
    Pilo R; Ben-Amar A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Aug; 82(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 10424986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of different amalgams bonded with dual cure resin cements.
    Lombard R; du Preez IC; Oberholzer TG
    SADJ; 2007 Mar; 62(2):056, 058-61. PubMed ID: 17624174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations.
    Erhardt MC; Magalhães CS; Serra MC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 12120778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.