These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11204041)

  • 1. Electrotactile adaptation on the abdomen: preliminary results.
    Kaczmarek KA
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 2000 Dec; 8(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 11204041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intermittent stimulation delays adaptation to electrocutaneous sensory feedback.
    Buma DG; Buitenweg JR; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 17894276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms.
    Kaczmarek KA; Webster JG; Radwin RG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):701-15. PubMed ID: 1516937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12797720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
    Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of sensation evoked by electrocutaneous stimulation on forearm in nondisabled subjects.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Petrini L; Jensen W
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 22773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Material Roughness Modulation via Electrotactile Augmentation.
    Yoshimoto S; Kuroda Y; Imura M; Oshiro O
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2015; 8(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 25794397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. System development for multichannel electrotactile stimulation on the lips.
    Shim JW; Liu W; Tang H
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Sep; 28(7):734-9. PubMed ID: 16386447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrotactile perception of scatterplots on the fingertips and abdomen.
    Haase SJ; Kaczmarek KA
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 Mar; 43(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 15865140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of tactile stimulation pulse characteristics on sensation threshold and power consumption.
    Nunziata E; Perez C; Jarmul E; Lipetz LE; Weed HR
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(4):423-35. PubMed ID: 2774316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
    Lindenblatt G; Silny J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential effects of noxious conditioning stimulation of the cheek by capsaicin on human sensory and inhibitory masseter reflex responses evoked by tooth pulp stimulation.
    Kemppainen P; Waltimo A; Waltimo T; Könönen M; Pertovaara A
    J Dent Res; 1997 Sep; 76(9):1561-8. PubMed ID: 9294490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lowering of sensory, motor, and pain-tolerance thresholds with burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation.
    Ward AR; Lucas-Toumbourou S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Aug; 88(8):1036-41. PubMed ID: 17678667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-pain and pain sensations evoked by tooth pulp stimulation.
    McGrath PA; Gracely RH; Dubner R; Heft MW
    Pain; 1983 Apr; 15(4):377-88. PubMed ID: 6866536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The afferent neural response to electrotactile stimuli: preliminary results.
    Kaczmarek KA; Tyler ME; Brisben AJ; Johnson KO
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 2000 Jun; 8(2):268-70. PubMed ID: 10896199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial masking in electrocutaneous sensation: a model for sensation matching, with applications to loudness recruitment.
    Larkin WD; Penner MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Sep; 46(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 2771612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial localization of electrotactile stimuli on the fingertip in humans.
    Bobich LR; Warren JP; Sweeney JD; Tillery SI; Santello M
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2007 Dec; 24(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 18097991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pulse Width Affects Scalp Sensation of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Peterchev AV; Luber B; Westin GG; Lisanby SH
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 28029593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Evaluation of Tactile Sensation by Electrical and Mechanical Stimulation.
    Yem V; Kajimoto H
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2017; 10(1):130-134. PubMed ID: 28113382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.