These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1120411)

  • 21. Complications of artificial heart valves.
    Kloster FE
    JAMA; 1979 May; 241(20):2201-3. PubMed ID: 430826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
    Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Supervision of patients with artificial heart valves (author's transl)].
    Englert M
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1977 Dec; 119(51-52):1671-4. PubMed ID: 414105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Evoluation and prognosis of a surgically corrected mitral valvulopathy].
    Boland J; Limet R
    Rev Med Liege; 1978 Aug; 33(16):559-68. PubMed ID: 705141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Valve reoperations. Apropos of 49 patients undergoing reoperation in a series of 1390 patients with 1 or more valve prostheses].
    Vanetti A; Pernet P; Gaillard D; Robinault J; Rolland JM
    Ann Chir; 1985 Oct; 39(7):443-7. PubMed ID: 4083754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Personal follow-up of 100 aortic valve replacement patients for 1081 patient years.
    Varstela E
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1998; 87(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 9825065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
    Bernal JM; Rabasa JM; Cagigas JC; Echevarria JR; Carrion MF; Revuelta JM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term follow-up of small (size 20 and 21) Medtronic-Hall aortic valve prostheses.
    Obadia JF; Martelloni YA; Bastien OH; Durand de Gevigney GM; Chassignolle JF
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1997 Aug; 64(2):421-5. PubMed ID: 9262587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards Model 1260 aortic valve prosthesis beyond ten years.
    Miller DC; Oyer PE; Mitchell RS; Stinson EB; Jamieson SW; Baldwin JC; Shumway NE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Aug; 88(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 6748713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
    Horstkotte D
    Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Twelve-year experience with the 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve.
    Nakajima H; Aupart MR; Neville PH; Sirinelli AL; Meurisse YA; Marchand MA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 9793853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve.
    Emery RW; Krogh CC; Jones DJ; Nicoloff DM; Blake DP; Arom KV
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [The importance of a regular check-up of patients with heart valve prostheses].
    Eijgelaar A; Homan van der Heide JN; Dorlas JC; Nieveen J; van de Wall E; Oostenrijk JF
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1969 Sep; 113(37):1590-3. PubMed ID: 5806235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis.
    Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Miyagishima RT; Munro AI; Ling H; Burr LH; Tutassaura H
    Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Dysfunctions of heart valve prostheses and their surgical treatment].
    Sadeghi H
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1987 Oct; 117(43):1665-70. PubMed ID: 3321421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Follow-up of isolated aortic valve prosthesis, 1964-86.
    Katz A; Fraser D; Weitzman S; Gueron M
    Isr J Med Sci; 1989 Oct; 25(10):564-7. PubMed ID: 2807855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ten to fifteen year reassessment of the performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards Model 6120 mitral valve prosthesis.
    Miller DC; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Reitz BA; Jamieson SW; Baumgartner WA; Mitchell RS; Shumway NE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Jan; 85(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 6848878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mitral valve replacement with Hancock porcine bioprostheses: up to 7-year follow-up.
    Brais MP; Bédard JP; Goldstein W; Koshal A; Keon WJ
    Can J Surg; 1985 Mar; 28(2):119-21, 123. PubMed ID: 3971234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical evaluation of the Omniscience cardiac valve prosthesis. Follow-up of up to 6 years.
    Akalin H; Corapçioğlu ET; Ozyurda U; Uçanok K; Uysalel A; Kaya B; Eren NT; Erol C
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Feb; 103(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 1735991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.