These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11205398)

  • 1. Chemical load as a factor in skin sensitization risk assessment: rodent versus man.
    Anigbogu AN; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Feb; 44(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11205398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A skin sensitization risk assessment approach for evaluation of new ingredients and products.
    Gerberick GF; Robinson MK
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Jun; 11(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 10908173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of skin sensitization assays.
    Basketter DA; Chamberlain M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1995 Dec; 33(12):1057-9. PubMed ID: 8847002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying skin sensitization potency.
    Roberts DW
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Jun; 66(6):356-7. PubMed ID: 22568851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skin sensitisation.
    Basketter D; Casati S; Gerberick GF; Griem P; Philips B; Worth A
    Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():83-103. PubMed ID: 16194142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The critical review of methodologies and approaches to assess the inherent skin sensitization potential (skin allergies) of chemicals. Part I.
    Thyssen JP; Giménez-Arnau E; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Boman A; Schnuch A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Apr; 66 Suppl 1():11-24. PubMed ID: 22380840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guinea pig sensitization assays: an experimental comparison of three methods.
    Modjtahedi BS; Fortenbach CR; Marsano JG; Gandhi AM; Staab R; Maibach HI
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 30(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 21265706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile: skin sensitization and quantitative risk assessment.
    Basketter DA
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2010 Mar; 29(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 19883218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preservatives and skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment.
    Basketter DA; Clapp CJ; Safford BJ; Jowsey IR; McNamee P; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 18346392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contact sensitization assays in guinea-pigs: are they predictive of the potential for systemic allergic reactions?
    Vial T; Descotes J
    Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 7974506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility study to support a threshold of sensitization concern concept in risk assessment based on human data.
    Keller D; Krauledat M; Scheel J
    Arch Toxicol; 2009 Dec; 83(12):1049-60. PubMed ID: 19680631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint positive control testing in guinea pig skin sensitization tests. A harmonized approach.
    Wiemann C; Berthold K; Heusener A; Krüger N; Seeberger A; Stropp G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 11846632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Updating exposure assessment for skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment for fragrance materials.
    Api AM; Basketter D; Bridges J; Cadby P; Ellis G; Gilmour N; Greim H; Griem P; Kern P; Khaiat A; O'Brien J; Rustemeyer T; Ryan C; Safford B; Smith B; Vey M; White IR
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Dec; 118():104805. PubMed ID: 33075411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk.
    Robinson MK; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; McNamee P; White IR; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 May; 42(5):251-9. PubMed ID: 10789838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
    McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fragrance material review on alpha-amylcinnamyl alcohol.
    Bhatia SP; Wellington GA; Cocchiara J; Lalko J; Letizia CS; Api AM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2007; 45 Suppl 1():S32-9. PubMed ID: 18037205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skin sensitization: Implications for integration of clinical data into hazard identification and risk assessment.
    Basketter DA; White IR; McFadden JP; Kimber I
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2015 Dec; 34(12):1222-30. PubMed ID: 26614809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of the skin sensitisation hazard of a group of polyfunctional silicones using a weight of evidence approach.
    Petry T; Bosch A; Coste X; Dupuis V; Eigler D; Germain P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Nov; 64(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 22981813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.