495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11206150)
1. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing protection: surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways.
Berger EH; Kieper RW; Gauger D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):1955-67. PubMed ID: 14587596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
Small SA; Hu N
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outer ear canal sound pressure and bone vibration measurement in SSD and CHL patients using a transcutaneous bone conduction instrument.
Ghoncheh M; Lilli G; Lenarz T; Maier H
Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():161-168. PubMed ID: 26723102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of sound measurement systems for auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Nam EC; Kim SS; Lee KU; Kim SS
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jun; 26(5):715-20. PubMed ID: 18440748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory localization in the horizontal plane with single and double hearing protection.
Brungart DS; Kordik AJ; Simpson BD; McKinley RL
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2003 Sep; 74(9):937-46. PubMed ID: 14503671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
Abel SM; Odell P
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A wavelet denoising approach for signal action isolation in the ear canal.
Vaidyanathan R; Wang S; Gupta L
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2677-80. PubMed ID: 19163256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.
Simpson BD; Bolia RS; McKinley RL; Brungart DS
Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 15960096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attenuation as a function of the canal length of custom-molded earplugs: a pilot study.
Tufts JB; Chen S; Marshall L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):EL446-51. PubMed ID: 23742438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Active control of the volume acquisition noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging: method and psychoacoustical evaluation.
Chambers J; Akeroyd MA; Summerfield AQ; Palmer AR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3041-54. PubMed ID: 11785805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
Schroeter J; Poesselt C
J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examination of bone-conducted transmission from sound field excitation measured by thresholds, ear-canal sound pressure, and skull vibrations.
Reinfeldt S; Stenfelt S; Good T; Håkansson B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1576-87. PubMed ID: 17407895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors contributing to bone conduction: the outer ear.
Stenfelt S; Wild T; Hato N; Goode RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):902-13. PubMed ID: 12597184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model predictions for bone conduction perception in the human.
Stenfelt S
Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():135-143. PubMed ID: 26657096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Tests for the correct insertion of earplugs in the ear canal performed with the use of a portable device].
Kozłowski E; Młyński R
Med Pr; 2021 Nov; 72(5):521-528. PubMed ID: 34596171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physical characteristics of gunfire impulse noise and its attenuation by hearing protectors.
Ylikoski M; Pekkarinen JO; Starck JP; Pääkkönen RJ; Ylikoski JS
Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 7761796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
Giguère C; Kunov H
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
